Democrats' Traditional Blocs Appear United Against Trump

Donald Lambro
|
Posted: May 13, 2016 12:01 AM
Democrats' Traditional Blocs Appear United Against Trump

America is at a political crossroads in its long and sometimes tumultuous history, trying to decide who is the best candidate to lead our country for the next four years.

No one can predict with any certainty how this election is going to turn out in November. The only thing we know for sure is that the two presumptive nominees are viewed negatively by more than half of the electorate.

Recent polling averages tracked by RealClearPolitics show Donald Trump draws an unfavorable rating of 65 percent, followed by Hillary Clinton with 55 percent.

Clinton's unfavorables match those of George W. Bush in his close 2004 re-election bid. And Trump's big negatives among nonwhite voters haven't been seen since Barry Goldwater's disastrous 1964 campaign.

Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska, who is very unhappy with the likelihood of Trump becoming his party's standard-bearer, wants a third-party candidate to enter the race. "There are dumpster fires in my town more popular than these two 'leaders,'" Sasse wrote in a recent note to a fellow Republican.

To be sure, this election year has been marked by scandal, incendiary racial issues, and ugly, vulgar, insulting language unheard of in modern American history.

Let's begin with Clinton, who is under a sweeping FBI investigation into her mishandling of classified information that she sent from a private, unsecured computer while she was secretary of state.

A review of the publicly released messages that Clinton sent through a secret home server showed that she wrote more than 100 emails that included classified information, according to investigators.

The FBI says the investigation is continuing, and that federal charges have not been ruled out, possibly before the November election. Federal prosecutors and FBI officials say they intend to interview Clinton at some point in the weeks to come, as well as other top aides. Insiders say there isn't any sign that a grand jury has been convened in this case, but that has not been ruled out.

Could the investigation produce a bombshell discovery that would irreparably damage her reputation in the midst of her campaign? Possibly.

But however it turns out, Clinton's reputation has already been hurt by the scandal, which has exposed her obsessive penchant for secrecy, her dishonesty, and poor judgment in dealing with national security information at the highest level of our government.

Trump has broken all the rules of political campaigning, using insults, bullying and X-rated language to attack his opponents. He's played fast and loose with "facts" that fact-checkers have shown to be utterly false, earning him Four Pinocchio scores for statements that are untrue.

For example: "There are scores of recent migrants inside our borders charged with terrorism."

The Washington Post's scrupulous fact-checker, Glenn Kessler, dug into this. It apparently came from a list -- compiled by GOP Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama -- of 30 foreign-born people arrested on charges related to terrorism.

"The majority of the 30 cases involved naturalized U.S. citizens -- people who came to the U.S. as children or had arrived before 2011," Kessler found. "We reviewed similar lists of cases from 2014 and 2015, involving 76 people charged with activities relating to foreign terrorist organizations."

Nearly 60 were U.S. citizens and seven were legally permanent residents. The rest were visa overstays. They were of Caucasian, African-American or Hispanic descent, and many of them had come here as children; their arrival certainly could not be defined as "recent."

But Trump's candidacy raises other deeply disturbing problems besides his juvenile temperament, name-calling and disregard for the truth. And that is his weakness among key political sectors of our electorate, which Republican leaders fear could lead to scores of losses in House and Senate races and further down the ballot.

Let's start with Hispanics. The Republicans cannot win without a sizable percentage of this voting bloc. Reagan drew more than 40 percent of them. George W. Bush did a bit better. President Obama captured 73 percent of them in 2012 against Mitt Romney, who wanted Hispanics to self-deport.

Hillary Clinton is expected to do much better with this voting bloc, with estimates of 80 to 90 percent, or more, of all Hispanic voters turning out to vote for her.

Indeed, with Trump campaigning on rounding up and deporting 11 to 12 million undocumented Hispanics and erecting a wall along the Mexican border, he'd be lucky to draw their support in the single digits.

Meantime, there has been a surge of voter registration among Hispanics and a record number of citizenship applications, too.

"Hispanics are flooding into citizenship workshops and congressional offices and jamming hotlines on how to become U.S. citizens or register to vote. Many say they are primarily motivated by the rise of Trump," the Post reports.

And what about women? Romney won 53 percent of the women's vote. Polls show Trump trailing Clinton by 19 points (35 percent to 54 percent) among female voters.

Trump has a large and energetic political base that's going to turn out in large numbers, too, in traditionally Democratic states where job losses are being blamed on free trade agreements and Obamanomics.

But will it be enough to offset the Democrats' traditional voting blocs, including a record-breaking surge among Hispanics' growing electorate? Stay tuned.