We Have Reached a Tipping Point for Tips
CIA COVID Whistleblower Has a Simple Request for the Media. You've Heard It...
Given These Bizarre Remarks From NJ's Governor About Illegal Alien Voters, What's She...
What Happened in New Jersey Regarding Illegal Alien Voters Is Just the Tip...
Trump Endorsed Mike Lindell. He Might Have to Suffocate It With a Pillow
We Have Another Bad Dem Internal Poll for This Congressional Race, but Here's...
KY Gov Just Issued a Health Ultimatum to Mitch McConnell
There It Is: Francesca Hong Would End Milwaukee's School Choice Program
J.K. Rowling Continues Hammering Amnesty International for Targeting Her Women's Shelter
Here's Chicago's Latest Solution to Crime on the Subway
Older Voters Will Shape Georgia’s Election, New AARP Poll Finds
One Standard for Government Failure
Yes on the AM Radio in Every Vehicle Act
Career Democrat Politicians vs. the Constitution
Biden's Last-Minute Amnesty Was Built to Outlast Him
OPINION

Is Banning Skinny Models a Legitimate Function of Government?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Is Banning Skinny Models a Legitimate Function of Government?

Notwithstanding my post comparing stupid government policies in the U.S. and U.K., I thought the Greeks took to prize for most moronic government.

After all, the politicians in that nation think it’s fine and dandy to subsidize pedophiles and collect stool samples as a condition of getting a business license to set up an online company.

But the United Kingdom will reclaim the top spot (or would it be the bottom spot?) if the government follows through on the advice of two nanny-state academics.

Here’s a blurb from a story in the Telegraph.

Experts said the eating disorder was a disease that was linked to social and cultural influenced, the Guardian reported. The LSE academics said restricting the use of photographs of underweight models in magazines would help ease the pressure on women to be very thin. In a paper that will be published in the journal Economia later this year, LSE economist Dr Joan Costa-Font and Professor Mireia Jofre-Bonet from City University wrote: “Government intervention would be justified to curb the spread of a potential epidemic of food disorders.

To be fair, there’s no indication in the story that the U.K. government will adopt the recommendation of these academics, but don’t be too optimistic. After all, this is the country that has done these crazy things:

o A job-placement center got in trouble for discriminating against incompetent people by seeking “reliable” and “hard-working” candidates.

o A women who was being threatened by thugs got in trouble with the police for brandishing a knife in her own home.

o A man got arrested for finding a gun in his yard and turning it over to the police.

o The government wanted to require “competency tests” for pet owners.

Remember, never underestimate the stupidity of government.

And I suppose this is the appropriate spot for a disclaimer.

Yes, I realize anorexia is not a joking matter. I’ve known people with this problem and I recognize it’s serious. But banning skinny models is an absurd and abusive way for politicians to deal with the issue.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement