There Are Nothing but Biased Concerns Seen in Tonight's Presidential Contest

Today, Ms. Hunt had on Biden spokesman Cedric Richmond, and the tongue bath interview was hitting saccharine levels of fawning support.

Recommended

All It Took for Democrats to Cave on DHS Funding Was Four Terrorist Attacks Amy Curtis

Related:

BRAD SLAGER MEDIA BIAS RIFFED FROM THE HEADLINES

CNN actually asks Biden campaign co-chair Cedric Richmond if President Trump would "deserve" a handshake from Crooked Joe Biden 🤡 pic.twitter.com/Zh3i4TqSud

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 27, 2024

Reporting on the Mirror – CNN

• Is this intended for 6-year-olds? (No, wait – our 6-year-old mastered the remote years ago.)

With a list of concessions made for this debate, differing from prior arrangements by the traditional Commission of Presidential Debates, one of the more lauded has been that CNN will be controlling the microphones and turning them down while the other candidate is speaking. We get a lengthy explanation video from the network about what this all means, how these will be operated, and what it will represent on screen while we are watching tonight's mental battle royale.

This is an overwrought and self-important display, for something that can be summed up in six words:

We'll Be Using a MUTE Button.

The sudden innovation in debate technology is remarkable. What could have driven this?pic.twitter.com/iJkoXtuqr1

— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) June 27, 2024

DNC PR Firm – THE NEW YORK TIMES

• Do we also get a ratio of the concentration of coverage by candidate?

Another of the concessions over prior debates is that there will be no audience for this matchup. Well, technically no general audience. There will, in fact, be a herd of media in attendance. We know this because The New York Times announced it is sending a massive squadron to the debate hall, with half of those being dedicated fact-checkers. Care to wager a guess where the bulk of their focus will be applied?

2 Candidates. No Audience. 60 New York Times Reporters.
This includes 29 fact-checkershttps://t.co/EKPZauyD64

— John kobos (@kobe_man59) June 26, 2024

Both Kinds of Standards – CNN

• If only Joe had some kind of track record of lying...

Recall just weeks ago when Joe Biden conducted a CNN interview, and amid a flurry of falsehoods their resident "presidential fact-checker" Daniel Dale busied himself with correct Donald Trump lies? Well, Danny has announced his return from retirement, it seems, and will be fully occupied tonight. Joe needn't worry.

Also focusing on the fraudulent content is the network's Brian Stelter replacement, Oliver Darcy, who in his newsletter declared that the role of correcting Trump's lies cannot be left to Joe Biden alone. Ollie has definitively stated that his network needs to undertake the burden of taking on Trump alongside the president.

Another sign of how slanted this debate is primed to become, here is CNN's media maven Oliver Darcy declaring that Trump, and only Trump, will be telling falsehoods and that the burden to correct him will be shared by the network.
Serial prevaricator Joe Biden need not worry! pic.twitter.com/2D7zp7NstW

— Brad Slager - Scrubbing Down In a Bloodbath (@MartiniShark) June 27, 2024

First Amendment Strike Force – CNN

• This kinda sounds like one of those threats to democracy things.

As another sign of how CNN is deviating from the standard norms of debate practice, the network has made it known that it will not be making the feed of the matchup available to all media. Instead, only approved outlets can have the direct feed, with all others being directed to watch through the CNN portals, like through its streaming service or the network's YouTube channel.

CNN has told Breaking Points it is NOT allowing independent media channels to stream their presidential debate despite granting permission to *all other terrestrial news organizations*

A blatant protection racket to protect elite media pic.twitter.com/YyLCD4Btdn

— Saagar Enjeti (@esaagar) June 25, 2024