Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
The War on Warring
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
OPINION

Obama's Stimulus Waste: $7 million per House on Internet Access

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

In our blog post of July 5, 2011 we cited analysis of the recently release quarterly summary report of Barack Obama's Stimulus that concluded the Administration spent $278,000 per job they claimed to have "saved or created" with the $666 billion the White House has spent thus far of the more than $800 billion authorized by the legislation approved in 2009.   

Advertisement

The Administration used the Stimulus as a private slush fund to funnel vast amounts of money to programs and industries favored by the President.  

One of his campaign pledges was to expand broadband internet access, particularly to rural areas, and with the Stimulus check book in hand, Obama proceeded to deliver on that promise spending a total of $7.2 billion, with $2.5 billion specifically allocated to "Rural Utilities Service" (RUS).  

Jeffry Eisenach and Kevin Caves of Navigant Economics, a financial and economic analysis and consulting firm looked at the results of Obama's rural broadband expansion efforts.   The results aren't very pretty.

The Navigant analysts evaluated programs in three areas: Southwestern Montana, Northwestern Kansas, and Northern Minnesota that received Stimulus funds to extend broadband access to homes currently lacking service.  

According to their report, it cost on average $349,234 per household.  

But, it gets worse. 

In the Montana region, there were actually a number of providers, including wireless, that already provided service in the area.  

Eisenach and Caves found that if 3G wireless was included, only seven households in the entire region could be considered to be without any option for access.  Thus, the cost to extend access to those seven homes was about $7 million each.  

Like Einstein said of insanity, this was doing the same thing over again and expecting different results.  

Advertisement

According to the Eisenach and Caves, "Prior investigations have shown that RUS' broadband subsidy programs were not cost effective, and often funded duplicative coverage in areas already served by existing programs."  

But, Obama funded it anyway – and sent American taxpayers the bill.  


See also these top features from Townhall Finance:

The Ticker... 

Daily Market Commentary

John Ransom Obama, the Poor Loser
Marc Nuttle The Monster in the Room: The World Debt Wall
Bob Beauprez Obama's Stimulus Waste: $7 million per House on Internet Access
Bill Tatro In God We Trust; All Others Pay Cash
Mike Shedlock Salaries Plunge for Lawyers; Unemployment Still High
Marita Noon DOE Pledges $4.5 Billion to Solar Co with Campaign Cash for Dems
Zacks Investment Research Littlefuse Inc.- Aggressive Growth


Join John Ransom on Facebook and follow him @Twitter 

email: thfinance@mail.com

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement