Can You Feel the Excitement? Kamala Is Back and in the Lead!
The AI Race Needs a Little More ‘I’ in It
Dana Bash Recalibrates Both Sides of ICE Protest, and Sen. Cruz Is Guilty...
A Republican Who Wants to Raise Taxes
Welcome to the Old World Order
The Midterms: It's Not About 'Affordability' -- It's About Trump Hatred
Trump’s First Year Delivered the Most Meaningful Education Reforms in Decades
Pro-Abortion James Talarico's Factless Campaign for the Senate
How America First Policies Can Lead to Even More Growth in 2026
If You Own It, You Should Be Able to Fix It
Minnesota Malfeasance Is a Preview of Biden-Era Fraud and Waste
Why Children Under 13 Should Be Banned From Social Media
A Refreshing Year for LGBT Conservatives
Jury Convicts Alleged Minneapolis Gang Member in Fatal Gas Station Attack
Former TD Bank Worker Helped Launder $26 Million Through Shell Accounts, Prosecutors Say
OPINION

American Sniper

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

A good war movie. Solid acting. Great direction.

Very controversial.

Most recently I saw the movie which depicts the life of Chris Kyle, Navy Seal, sharpshooter and to most, a real life American hero. The Academy Award nominated film has brought forth a heated debate over what some called the glorification of killing versus the glorification of duty and service to country.

Advertisement

Both miss the point of what the debate should be about. Sorry Mr. Moore, Rogen, Cain, and Hannity.

The first thing I learned from the film was that this was not a “war on” something. Most of us have become complacent to a “war on drugs”, “war on literacy”, “war on obesity”, “war on poverty” and turned off by the casual over usage of the word “war”.

Chris Kyle said pointblank to his wife that we are at war fighting against people who want to kill us. Not some undefinable “war on”.

His Commanding Officer told him that the Marines would be going house to house routing out the bad guys and his job was to protect them. Who could really argue with Kyle’s job protecting Americans?

That, however, brings me to the second thing I learned from the film, but more important, from my father.

Dad, William III, was in the Fourth Marine Division and survived the landing and battle of Iwo Jima in the Second World War. He always said that the most difficult and highest casualty rate was when troops went cave to cave or house to house which is why saturation bombing was always done before an invasion.

Putting aside the question of why our troops were and are there in the first place, it should be asked why our men and women are put in harm’s way and why there is even a need for a Chris Kyle.

Advertisement

The movie clearly points out that the town where Kyle was stationed was to have been evacuated and anyone left was a bad guy-man, woman or child.

The Butcher, who the Americans were chasing, was somewhere in the town. The dead American soldiers could have been saved, not by more Chris Kyles, but by a change in political attitude.

If this is War, then the town should have been blown to smithereens and everything and everyone decimated. That approach would have reduced the odds dramatically that snipers, bombers or the sought after Butcher would be left to kill or wound Americans. Thus eliminating the job Chris Kyle was forced to do.

However, if this is not War, just some politically correct blasé “war on” …well!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement