Nobody’s Calling London
CNN Produces a Romance Thriller for the NYC Bombers, and David French Backs...
The Democrats’ Republic of Iran
Should the Supreme Court Reconsider New York Times v. Sullivan?
Do Public Schools Need a 'Jan. 6 Insurrection' Course?
Fix What's Broken at Home so We Can Defend Ourselves Abroad
Blue-State Suicide
Protect the Border and the Ballot Box
The Sin of Accepting Support From Jews
Iran’s New Supreme Leader: The Rise of Mojtaba Khamenei
Is Proof of Citizenship Really Jim Crow 2.0
A Landmark Verdict Sparks the Collapse of Youth Gender-Affirming Surgeries, but True Justi...
SAVE Act Lifted by Paxton-Cornyn Race
The Left Is Really Mad That We Bought Our Troops Steak and Lobster...
Trump Is Bringing Historic Changes to the U.S. Energy Sector
OPINION

Bah Humbug: 'Tis The Season to be an Analyst

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Bah Humbug: 'Tis The Season to be an Analyst

It’s earnings season, and once again, ‘tis the season to be jolly.  

It never fails to amaze me how every quarter the pundits drool over the corporations beating analysts’ expectations.

Advertisement

In no way do I want to contribute to unemployment, but perhaps the most useless profession is equities analyst. 

However, every bank, brokerage firm, mutual fund, and broker dealer seems to differ with my opinion because they employ dozens of these people. 

Years ago, equities analysts were the mainstay of Wall Street.  They would take the time to personally visit certain corporations in order to perform hands-on research, query the management, and witness production firsthand. 

In essence, they got up close and personal. 

The analysts did the grunt work that produced honest and accurate numbers, and they would report exactly what they believed was going to happen based upon firsthand knowledge. 

Unfortunately, the government, in its infinite wisdom, believed that relationships between corporate management and certain analysts got too cozy. 

Therefore, they decided to make it a level playing field. 

All information that was provided to one group had to be provided to all. 

What was once on-site in-depth research reverted to in-office estimates, so it became very easy for these analysts to sit back and simply throw some numbers against the wall. 

For as many quarters as I can remember, corporations have beaten the analyst’s expectations about 75% of the time. 

So, let me get this straight, quarter after quarter, analysts get their predictions wrong 75% of the time?  

Advertisement

Yet, they’re still listened to, fawned over, and taken for gospel.  

No one could be wrong for so long and still be considered a benchmark.  

That being said, it is possible that these same analysts simply lowball their figures so that corporations seem to be doing better than expected? 

You’ll hear the pundits say “the great earnings season,” “better than expected,” “a terrific surprise,” when in reality all that’s happened is that expectations have been lowered.  

It would seem to me the easiest way to establish earnings performance is to simply compare quarter-to-quarter and year-over-year figures.

This would create a true picture of what the company is doing in the trajectory of growth through sales and earnings.  

The guesswork would be removed, however, so would the need for equities analysts.  

Oh well, since Vegas has its bookies, I guess Wall Street must have its analysts.  

Come to think of it, being wrong (hitless) 75% of the time in baseball would probably get you a multi-million dollar contract. 

Go figure.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement