Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
CBS News Peddled Fake News About Bad Bunny and ICE Post-Super Bowl Performance
Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
A Bar Patron Had a Total Meltdown During the Super Bowl. The Reason...
Maybe We Should Be Glad Bad Bunny Performed in Spanish
Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
Is There Any Good News Out There?
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Talks About Talks: How Tehran Is Buying Time While Washington Hesitates
OPINION

Greenspan: They Missed Meltdown, Could Miss Again

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Very rarely do I watch the cheerleaders and spinmeisters on CNBC. 

I used to be hooked like most, but got turned off by the daily walk in fantasyland and liberal political posturing. 

Advertisement

Much to my surprise, I found myself glued to a recent interview with the maestro, Alan Greenspan, on none other than CNBC. 

Shockingly, I found an ally regarding my economic thesis and approach to the financial markets. 

As you know, I believe that THINGS are not improving. 

As a matter of fact, they’re sliding deeper and deeper into the abyss.  (Thus, preservation of capital is paramount.) 

However, most economists’ models show just the opposite. 

The Keynesian approach would have you believe that “God’s in His heaven and all’s right with the world.” 

My new best friend, the maestro, concluded (I’ll paraphrase): If the Fed and IMF have the best models and they missed 2008, why isn’t it reasonable to believe that second line econometric models could and would miss the current reality.

I’ve stated that the stimulus gave only a temporary relief to the economy and would prove transitional to more severe times.  (Thus, preservation of capital and income is vital.) 

My new hero, Mr. Greenspan, stated the banks haven’t even used up QE1 reserves yet, and are sitting on QE2, parked at the Fed and drawing interest. 

Advertisement

That’s over $1.5 trillion dollars not being lent either for lack of demand or stringent terms and conditions, or both. 

I take exception with Mr. Greenspan declaring the banks haven’t used the money for lending.  They’ve certainly lent it to the banks for use in the stock and commodity markets. 

However, we both concur that when the Fed takes that money back, it could prove interesting and tumultuous. 

Finally, the former Fed Chairman said there would be no, that’s NO, recovery without construction being revived, while Case-Shiller reports the continued decline in housing prices. 

Greenspan believes that no real recovery is in sight without the 2 million lost construction jobs coming back, and house prices finding somewhat of a floor, sooner rather than later. 

That would be the real sign that we’ve turned the corner.  Until then, Keynesian models, cheerleading, and spinmeistering are all just smoke and mirrors coupled with wishful thinking.

That makes preservation of capital, income, and liquidity paramount, and leaves growth far behind. 

Advertisement

Gee, a new best friend who’s in my camp, and a return to an old TV network (briefly) all in one day. 

More than a fella can stand.                       


See Also These Top Columns 

 
 
See The Ticker for daily commentary on money and markets.

Join John Ransom on Facebook and follow him @Twitter 

email: thfinance@mail.com


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement