The Hollywood ‘Counter-Programming’ to the Fights At the White House Was Pathetic
Energy Commission Moves to Lower Prices for Americans
'It's Only a Matter of National Security': America's Workforce Academy's Mission to Fill...
Who Really Won—or Is Winning—the American-Persian War?
You Can't Always Want What You Get
America Still Loves the Flag. It Just Doesn't Trust the People Running the...
The Fallout in LA From Pratt's Fall
World Cup Fever Stirs High School Soccer Memories
Trump's Iran Deal – Peace in Our Time or a Dangerous Illusion?
There Sports Bettors Just Lost Millions After Cabo Verde's Historic Draw Against Spain
TX Dem Bobby Pulido's Out-Of-Touch Comments Resurface Days After Latest Scandal
Sen. Dan Sullivan's Battle With a Bogus Candidate Is Finally Over
Here's What to Expect in Tuesday's Elections – And What Trump Has Said
Here's a Reality Check on James Talarico's Immigration Flip-Flop
Minnesota's Latest Fraud Scandal: 7,700 Ghost Students, $12.5 Million Gone
OPINION

Protecting Chokepoints Remains a Key Strategic Challenge

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Protecting Chokepoints Remains a Key Strategic Challenge

In January, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence published two complementary documents: "National Intelligence Strategy 2019" and "The Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community." The second report was based on DNI Daniel Coats testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

Advertisement

The Strategy report had succinct summaries of challenges America faces. For example, U.S. "adversaries pose challenges within traditional, non-traditional, hybrid, and asymmetric military, economic, and political spheres." Let's translate the jargon. Traditional indicates conflict involving land, sea and air space and resources. Nontraditional means cyber. Hybrid and asymmetric indicate adversary operations integrating all of the elements of power in unexpected ways. Diplomatic, Information, Military and Economic power form DIME power.

The Strategy report also noted rapid advances in technology "pose new and evolving threats -- particularly in the realm of space, cyberspace, computing, and other emerging, disruptive technologies." Moreover some tech advances will give weaker adversaries "sophisticated capabilities."

That point isn't new but serves as a reminder that on 9/11 al-Qaida turned jumbo jets into ICBMs.

The Threat document repeated the importance of "narratives" in Chinese and Russian strategy. This isn't new either, but the speed and pervasiveness of digital information technologies enhance the power of propaganda.

The Threat report also served as a reminder -- albeit it indirectly -- that geographical interests remain critical strategic considerations.

For example, the section on Iranian "Military Modernization and Behavior" led to a discussion of Iran's desire to "disrupt (sea and air) traffic through the Strait of Hormuz." Closing Hormuz requires new missiles, robot ships, naval mines and advanced torpedoes. The Iranian dictatorship plays the same dangerous "chokepoint" game when its Yemen Houthi rebel proxies attack ships passing the Bab el Mandeb strait, which connects the Indian Ocean to the Red Sea and then the Suez Canal.

Advertisement

Hormuz, Mandeb and the Suez Canal are classic geographic maritime chokepoints through which freighters and tankers must pass to move goods and oil from Producer A to Customer B.

Slightly less than a third of the world's daily oil exports transit the Strait of Hormuz aboard super tankers. Iran ritually threatens to close the waterway. When it does, crude prices spike and economies sputter, though less so thanks to U.S. fracking.

Here's a working definition of a chokepoint: a geographic feature or place through or around which a ship or plane or vehicle or person is forced to pass in order to reach another location. In a western, when the sheriff's posse cuts off outlaws "at the pass," the pass is a chokepoint physically constricting the bad guys' escape.

Chokepoints matter, economically and militarily. Most of the world's trade passes through nine maritime chokepoints: Hormuz, Malacca Straits, Mandeb, Suez, Gibraltar, Cape Horn, Cape of Good Hope, Panama Canal and the Turkish Straits. The Danish Straits also matter -- especially to Russia.

Everyone using a computer knows internet data can be disrupted. The cyberspace "domain" has features analogous to geographic features. The 21st-century's best-known cyber superhighway is the internet.

However, the internet has maritime chokepoints. In 2010, Jeremy Blackham and Gwyn Prins wrote that over 90 percent of global email traffic was "conveyed via undersea fiber-optic cables. These cables bunch in several critical sea areas (off New York ... the English Channel, the South China Sea ... and off the west coast of Japan)."

Advertisement

Maps from 2018 record more undersea cables, but their routes differ little from 2010. One trade organization estimated they handle over 95 percent of all intercontinental data.

Satellites offer an alternative data route, but they are vulnerable, too. The DNI's "Threat" report mentioned Chinese and Russian antisatellite weapons that can target spy and communication satellites.

Is near space geographic? It is a place.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement