Who Was Cesar Chavez — and Who Will He Become?
Washington Post 'Proves' Republicans Struggle With Bigotry With...Anti-Trump Figure Promot...
Everytown for Gun Safety Celebrates WA's 'Ghost Gun' Bill. Here's What They Get...
Marco Rubio: Trump Taking Decisive Action Against Iran Protects Americans and the World
ICE Agent Saves Choking 1-Year-Old at JFK as Democrats Fearmonger About ICE in...
Don Lemon Gets A Slap in the Face as a Persian Man Rejects...
US Oil and Gas Association Calls Out Sen. Mark Kelly As He Complains...
Steve Witkoff Gives Updates on Iran Peace Talks, and Issues a Stern Warning
Alleged Brooklyn Gang Member Sentenced to 12 Years for $800K COVID Fraud Scheme
DOJ Revokes Citizenship of Two, Targets Third in Immigration Fraud Crackdown
Chinese National Faces Prison, Then Deportation After $95,000 Elder Fraud Conspiracy
Trump to Sign Order Ensuring Immediate Pay for TSA Agents Amid Airport Chaos,...
Armed Massachusetts Man Pleads Guilty to Attempted Assassination of Trump's Cabinet Member...
California Woman Ordered to Repay $14M Over Medicare Scam
Fraud Ring Allegedly Used Fake IDs to Steal Nearly $1M From Public Assistance...
Tipsheet

Liberal Law Professor Shreds Dems' Calls for ACB to Recuse Herself From Election-Related Cases

Liberal Law Professor Shreds Dems' Calls for ACB to Recuse Herself From Election-Related Cases
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley slammed Democrats' assertion that Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett should have to abstain from any cases related to the 2020 presidential election. According to Turley, there's no reason for Barrett not to participate simply because she was confirmed before an election.

Advertisement

"Jonathan, so that brings us to the fact that Justice now Amy Coney Barrett is in this position in this Court that is now nine, filling the spot of deceased Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Democrats, during that hearing, were saying, 'You have to recuse yourself if an election case comes to the Supreme Court after November 3rd.' I assume we're going to hear that more," Fox News' Bret Baier said.

"It will and it's utterly ridiculous and it's also incredibly insulting. There's no reason under the usual interpretation of the standard for recusal for Justice Barrett to withdraw from this case," Turley explained. "She doesn't have an interest in this case. She doesn't have a financial interest in this case. She didn't work on underlying litigation or cases related to any appeal. None of those conditions exist."

"I know of no case in history where a justice would recuse herself simply because she was nominated shortly before an election and some people, as you heard, as a judicial shill," he said.

Advertisement

Related:

2020 ELECTION

Turley made the statement shortly before President Donald Trump addressed supporters around 2 a.m. Wednesday morning. The president made clear that he plans to litigate mail-in ballots in some of the key swing states. 

As of now, results from battleground states like Pennsylvania and Michigan might not be decided until the end of the week.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement