Only Jealous Pinko Losers Begrudge Elon Musk His Well-Deserved Success
Remember That Kid Who Said He Wouldn’t Work for Jews? Well...
No Way CNN Did This Regarding the Algae in the Reflecting Pool?!
This Brazilian Bridge Jump Disaster Keeps Getting Worse
California’s Insane ‘Prove You’re Gay’ Law
This Anti-Gunner Used the Anniversary of a Racist Church Shooting to Push Gun...
American Nuclear Energy Reaches Milestone Decades in the Making. Is the 'Renaissance' Fina...
Trooping the Coroner
Victor Davis Hanson: The Biggest Test of the Iran Deal Comes Down to...
Harmeet Dhillon Just Launched an Investigation Into CA's Gay-Contract Program
Father's Day: Music, My Aunt, My Career and My Dad
For Americans and Our Guests, the World Cup Runneth Over
The Verdict Was Just. The Fallout Is a Hate Crime.
Is Gov. DeWine Uncovering Data Center Realities?
What History Teaches Us About Why So Many Eventually Flee Socialism
Tipsheet

Liberal Law Professor Shreds Dems' Calls for ACB to Recuse Herself From Election-Related Cases

Liberal Law Professor Shreds Dems' Calls for ACB to Recuse Herself From Election-Related Cases
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley slammed Democrats' assertion that Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett should have to abstain from any cases related to the 2020 presidential election. According to Turley, there's no reason for Barrett not to participate simply because she was confirmed before an election.

Advertisement

"Jonathan, so that brings us to the fact that Justice now Amy Coney Barrett is in this position in this Court that is now nine, filling the spot of deceased Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Democrats, during that hearing, were saying, 'You have to recuse yourself if an election case comes to the Supreme Court after November 3rd.' I assume we're going to hear that more," Fox News' Bret Baier said.

"It will and it's utterly ridiculous and it's also incredibly insulting. There's no reason under the usual interpretation of the standard for recusal for Justice Barrett to withdraw from this case," Turley explained. "She doesn't have an interest in this case. She doesn't have a financial interest in this case. She didn't work on underlying litigation or cases related to any appeal. None of those conditions exist."

"I know of no case in history where a justice would recuse herself simply because she was nominated shortly before an election and some people, as you heard, as a judicial shill," he said.

Advertisement

Related:

2020 ELECTION

Turley made the statement shortly before President Donald Trump addressed supporters around 2 a.m. Wednesday morning. The president made clear that he plans to litigate mail-in ballots in some of the key swing states. 

As of now, results from battleground states like Pennsylvania and Michigan might not be decided until the end of the week.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement