Here's What a CNN Host Said About Tim Walz That Left Scott Jennings...
What ICE Agents Did After Eating Lunch at a Mexican Restaurant in MN...
Wait, That's How a Local Minnesota Dem Described the Leftist Violence Against ICE
Lawrence O'Donnell's Selective Outrage at Vulgarity, and Abby Phillip Gets Debunked by Abb...
Jacob Frey Cannot Get His Way
INSANITY: Mob of Leftist Rioters Stab and Beat Anti-Islam Activist in Minneapolis
U.S. Strike in Syria Kills Terrorist Linked to Murder of American Soldiers
Florida Man Convicted of $4.5M Scheme to Defraud U.S. Military Fuel Program
Chinese National Pleads Guilty to $27 Million Scam Targeting 2,000 Elderly Victims Nationw...
Orange County Man Arrested for Alleged Instagram Death Threats Against VP JD Vance
Hannity Grills Democrat Shri Thanedar After He Admits Voting Against Deporting Illegal Sex...
$68 Million Medicaid Fraud: Two Plead Guilty Over Brooklyn Adult Day Care Scheme
The Trump Administration Just Announced New Tariffs on Countries Deploying Troops to Green...
Minneapolis Alleged Gang Member, Felon Charged After Allegedly Stealing Rifle From FBI Veh...
JD Vance Just Destroyed This Indiana Republican for Failing to Act on Redistricting
Tipsheet

Finally, Some Good TSA News

Last week, Sacramento International Airport was officially approved by TSA officials for screening privatization. Jessica Zuckerman of the Heritage Foundation reported on this recent development.
Advertisement

The move is part of TSA’s Security Partnership Program (SPP), the nearly eight-year-old program allowing U.S. airports to opt out of federal screening and instead privatize their security forces. If Sacramento receives final approval from TSA, it would become the third major airport to participate in the SPP program.

In all, 16 airports currently participate in the SPP program. This small number of participants is partially due to long-standing TSA resistance to the program, which culminated early last year when TSA head John Pistole said the agency would no longer expand the program to additional airports. Pistole justified this decision by claiming that he did not see “any clear or substantial advantage to doing so at this time.”

Thankfully, many in Congress were of a different opinion. In this year’s Federal Aviation Administration authorization bill, Congress passed a provision requiring that TSA consider all SPP applications in a fair, timely, and transparent manner. The legislation further dictates that any application that does not threaten to “not compromise security or detrimentally affect the cost-efficiency or the effectiveness of screening” must be approved.

TSA has long tried to argue that use of privatized screening costs anywhere from 3 percent to 9 percent more than use of federal screening, while other opponents have argued that the SPP program threatens security by reducing TSA flexibility and cohesion. According to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, however, U.S. taxpayers would save “$1 billion over five years if the Nation’s top 35 airports operated as efficiently as [San Francisco International Airport] does under the SPP model.” This same study also concluded that SPP screeners are 65 percent more efficient than federal screeners.
Advertisement

Does this mean that TSA is going to be gradually phased out? Maybe, maybe not. Only a small handful of airports have opted into the Security Partnership Program. Also, the TSA has expanded to train stations and bus terminals. Expecting the TSA to go away overnight is not realistic. With that being said, a limited number of airports and Congress both working to privatize airport screening is a step in the right direction.

This post was authored by Townhall.com editorial intern Kyle Bonnell

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos