You Can't Do That: Florida Officer Arrests Man Who Vandalized Car With Anti-Biden...
The Pro-Hamas Antics on College Campuses Is Starting to Make Dems Nervous
Trump’s VP Pick Should Be Someone Who Has Never Admitted to Shooting a...
Pro-Israel and Pro-Hamas Protesters at the University of Alabama Did Agree on One...
Try This Crap In A Red State
Demeaning, Diminishing, Destroying
Campus Protests: Switch Out the Word 'Jew' and Replace It With 'Black'
Will the Students Globalize the Intifada?
White House, Gun Control Groups’ Trojan Horse
Protests and Policy as Porn
Will California Hobble the US Railroad Industry?
Philadelphia Court Forced Jewish Doctor to Choose Between Faith and Justice
Bipartisan Bill to Protect Children from Social Media Is Back
What These Pro-Hamas Protests Tell Us About America’s Judeo-Christian Heritage
Trump Announces Plans to Make Unusual Campaign Stop
Tipsheet

Former Atlanta Police Officer Charged With Murder After Shooting of Rayshard Brooks

Atlanta Police Department via AP

A former Atlanta law enforcement officer, Garrett Rolfe, who shot and killed Georgia resident Rayshard Brooks at an Atlanta Wendy’s was charged with felony murder, among other offenses, on Wednesday, per the Fulton County District Attorney’s office. The other charges include violation of oath and aggravated assault. A second officer on the scene was also charged with aggravated assault and violation of oath.

Advertisement

Per previous footage of the incident, Brooks was cooperative with law enforcement after being pulled over for driving under the influence. Upon failing the routine breathalyzer test, law enforcement on the scene struggled to take Brooks into custody. Brooks managed to grab an officer’s taser and charged toward Rolfe. This escalation led Rolfe to shoot Brooks. 

Rolfe’s defense team argues that the officers involved were completely within their rights, given Brooks’ violent behavior, via Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC):

"A peace officer may use deadly force to 1. arrest a suspected felon when he reasonably believes that the suspect poses an immediate threat of physical violence to the officer or others, 2. to protect himself and others from a life-threatening injury, and 3. to prevent the commission of a forcible felony. Mr. Brooks violently attacked two officers and disarmed one of them. When Mr. Brooks turned and pointed an object at Officer Rolfe, any officer would have reasonably believed that he intended to disarm, disable, or seriously injure him.”

Advertisement

This is a developing story.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement