This Bill Maher Episode Was Wild...and the Libs Are Not Going to Like...
Caitlin Clark Is Making Other WNBA Coaches Post Delusional Nonsense on Social Media
It Was Clear Kathy Hochul Was Not Welcome Here
We Shouldn't Be Shocked If the Venezuela Earthquakes Wiped Out Tens of Thousands...
Why Janice Dean Got Forced Into Retirement
Gavin Newsom Just Took This Stupid Billionaire Tax Idea to a Whole New...
One Dead After Eight People Overdose While DC Struggles to Combat Opioid Addiction
Too Little, Too Late: The NYT Let Chevalier’s Radical History Slide Until After...
This South Dakota Democrat May Have Lost by Just Two Votes
DOJ Sues Four States That Refused to Hand Over SNAP Data
The U.S.'s Path to the World Cup Final Is Here and It's Not...
San Francisco Trans March Turns on One of California's Most Radical Progressive Democrat
Alaska Judge Rules That Bogus Democrat-Recruited Senate Candidate Can Remain on Ballot
Texas Democrats Have a Plan to Beat Ken Paxton: Calling Talarico's Supporters Gay...
Cities Won’t Solve the Housing Crisis by Blaming Software
Tipsheet

US Ambassador to UN Explains Veto of Resolution Calling for Humanitarian Ceasefire in Gaza

US Ambassador to UN Explains Veto of Resolution Calling for Humanitarian Ceasefire in Gaza
Michael Reynolds/Pool via AP

The United States was the sole veto of an Algerian proposal at the UN Security Council that called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. 

Algeria’s representative to the U.N., Amar Bendjama, criticized the U.S., arguing that "voting against it implies an endorsement of the brutal violence and collective punishment inflicted upon them.”  

Advertisement

But Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, explained the veto in a statement. 

“For weeks, we have made it incredibly clear that the resolution before the council would not achieve the goal of a sustainable peace and may in fact run counter to it,” she said. “Proceeding with a vote today was wishful and irresponsible." 

Instead, the U.S. is circulating draft text of a competing resolution that calls for a temporary humanitarian ceasefire and the release of hostages. 

“And so while we cannot support a resolution that would put sensitive negotiations in jeopardy, we look forward to engaging on a text that we believe will address so many of the concerns we all share, a text that can and should be adopted by the council so that we can have a temporary ceasefire as soon as practical, based on the formula of all hostages being released,” she said.

"This temporary ceasefire is critical to getting aid into the hands of Palestinian civilians who desperately, desperately need it," Thomas-Greenfield added. "We should look towards this text so that we can finally, finally, condemn Hamas for their horrific attacks on October 7, which set this conflict into motion; so that we can empower Senior Coordinator Kaag and the United Nations, because her success, is the UN’s success; and it is so very needed to ensure civilians get the aid that they need, more efficiently and effectively, and just more, period. And so that, ultimately, we can together help create a future in which Israelis and Palestinians live in states of their own, side by side, in peace."

Advertisement


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement