Men Are Going to Strike Back
Wait, That's Why Dems Are Scared About ICE Agents Wearing Body Cams
Bill Maher Had the Perfect Response to Billie Eilish's 'Stolen Land' Nonsense
Some Guy Wanted to Test Something at an Anti-ICE Rally. Their Reaction Says...
The Trump Team Quoted the Perfect TV Show to Defend a Proposed WH...
Why This Former CNN Reporter Saying He'd Fire Scott Jennings Is Amusing
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
Don Lemon Plays Civil Rights Martyr After Cities Church Mob Arrest
Canadian PM Carney Just Announced a Plan to Make Canadian Inflation Worse
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
Senior Voters Are Key for a GOP Victory in Midterms
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
Tipsheet

Judge Hands Down Sentence to Former Trump Adviser Peter Navarro for Contempt of Congress

Former Trump adviser Peter Navarro was handed a four-month prison sentence Thursday for defying a Jan. 6 committee subpoena.

Additionally, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ordered Navarro to pay a $9,500 fine, considerably less than the $200,000 fine the Justice Department sought.

Advertisement

Navarro, a trade adviser to the former president, was convicted in September of two counts of contempt of Congress for not producing documents related to the investigation and dodging his deposition. 

“Let’s be clear, Dr. Navarro: You are not a victim here,” Mehta said during a court hearing. “This is not a political prosecution [and] these are circumstances of your own making.”

He continued: "Your obligation as an American is to cooperate with Congress, to provide them with the information they were seeking."

Mehta said he made Congress' job more difficult and that's what the case is about. "It wasn't a kangaroo court," he argued. "The public could see that."

The judge said that, given Navarro’s background, he should have known that he had a duty to comply with the congressional subpoena. Navarro had tried to cite executive privilege, a legal doctrine that allows some conversations between a president and advisers to remain confidential.

The judge said that, even if executive privilege had been properly invoked, Navarro was still required to provide some information to the committee.

“You were more than happy to talk to the press about what you did… but not go up to the Hill to talk to Congress,” the judge said.

“The words ‘executive privilege’ are not some magical incantation,” the judge said. “It’s not a Get Out of Jail Free card.”

The Justice Department had suggested a six-month sentence for Navarro, saying he had thumbed his nose at congressional authority as if he were above the law.

Another Trump ally, Steve Bannon, was previously sentenced to four months in prison for similar conduct. A judge allowed Bannon to remain free while he pursues an appeal of his underlying conviction, which is still pending. (WSJ)

Advertisement

Related:

JANUARY 6

According to Axios, Navarro immediately appealed to the D.C. Court of Appeals.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement