Oh, So That's Why DOJ Isn't Going After Pro-Terrorism Agitators
The UN Endorses a Second Terrorist State for Iran
Biden Administration Hurls Israel Under the Bus Again
Israeli Ambassador Shreds the U.N. Charter in Powerful Speech Before Vote to Grant...
New Single Article of Impeachment Filed Against Biden
New Report Details How Dems Are Planning to Minimize Risk of Pro-Hamas Disruptions...
The Long Haul of Love
Trump Addresses the Very Real Chance of Him Going to Jail
Yes, Jen Psaki Really Said This About Biden Cutting Off Weapons Supply to...
3,000 Fulton County Ballots Were Scanned Twice During the 2020 Election Recount
Joe Biden's Weapons 'Pause' Will Get More Israeli Soldiers, Civilians Killed
Left-Wing Mayor Hires Drag Queen to Spearhead 'Transgender Initiatives'
NewsNation Border Patrol Ride Along Sees Arrest of Illegal Immigrants in Illustration of...
One State Just Cut Off Funding for Planned Parenthood
Vulnerable Democratic Senators Refuse to Support Commonsense Pro-Life Bill
Tipsheet

Deceptive Budgeting, Bloated Spending, Wasteful Subsidies: The 2013 Farm Bill

The Senate is this week taking up the "farm bill," which is a collection of subsidies, agriculture programs and food stamps targeted by conservatives for its waste. 80% of the total cost of the bill - expected to cost almost $1
Advertisement
trillion over ten years - goes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (food stamps).

The cost of SNAP has skyrocketed in the Obama years as, due to the 2008 economic downturn, many more people have gone on food stamps:

SNAP has more than doubled in cost since 2008 due to the economic downturn, fluctuating food prices and eligibility requirements loosened in the 2009 economic stimulus bill.

As the Associated Press found, in 2012 alone, the program cost $78.4 billion to put 46 million people on food stamps.

There's also likely to be tricky accounting in the newest incarnation of the farm bill. Vince Smith of the American Enterprise Institute wrote that lawmakers are attempting to sell the bill as a "deficit-reduction measure," they're double-dipping in order to get a friendly budget score.

Instead of counting the bill’s savings against the previous farm bill’s budget, Senate Agriculture committee members have included the sequestration spending cuts in their savings estimates. This makes it appear as though the committee’s bill annually saves $600 million more than it actually does.

For more on what's shaping up to be a particularly bad farm bill, Diane Katz at the Heritage Foundation wrote a good intro:

Advertisement
Spending for the 2002 farm bill (2003–2007) totaled a whopping $241 billion. At the time of enactment, the 2008 farm bill was estimated to cost $284 billion over five years (and $604 billion over 10 years). However, significantly higher spending on crop insurance and food stamps increased actual outlays.

The most recent 10-year cost projections for last year’s Senate and House legislation are $963 billion and $950 billion, respectively, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Congress can take important incremental steps by eliminating the most costly and indefensible subsidies. Specifically, legislators should target programs that use taxpayer dollars to cover nominal risks. They should also target farm programs that subsidize farmers regardless of whether they grow crops or earn a high income.

Here's AEI's infographic about the deceptive budgeting currently going into the 2013 farm bill:


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement