CBS News Peddled Fake News About Bad Bunny and ICE Post-Super Bowl Performance
Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
A Bar Patron Had a Total Meltdown During the Super Bowl. The Reason...
Maybe We Should Be Glad Bad Bunny Performed in Spanish
Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
Let’s Rip Democrats Apart for Fun (and Because They’re Truly Awful)
Is There Any Good News Out There?
Has There Been Voter Fraud?
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Talks About Talks: How Tehran Is Buying Time While Washington Hesitates
Girl Scout Cookies vs. the Inverted Food Pyramid
SBA Prioritizes American Citizens for New Loans
Tipsheet

Federal Court Allows Challenge to Obamacare

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied the Obama administration’s motion to dismiss Virginia’s lawsuit against Obamacare. Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli filed one of the three major lawsuits against President Obama’s healthcare law, focusing on the issue that the individual mandate, requiring every American to purchase health insurance, is unconstitutional.

Advertisement

For the reason my coauthor and I explained in the Wall Street Journal in January and last month, the Obamacare individual mandate is clearly unconstitutional. In researching this issue for our book, The Blueprint: Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution and Build an Imperial Presidency, Ken Blackwell and I found that commanding Americans to buy insurance is not authorized by even the most liberal precedents of the Supreme Court interpreting the Commerce Clause, the Taxing and Spending Clause, or the General Welfare Clause.

The U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS) hoped to make quick work of this lawsuit by getting it dismissed. HHS argued both that Virginia lacks standing to bring this lawsuit, and that the lawsuit was not ripe for court consideration. Judge Henry Hudson disagreed in a 32-page decision.

This is only the beginning of the fight. All today’s ruling means that the lawsuit can go forward. But this was the first battle in the constitutional war to enforce the plain meaning of the Constitution.

Advertisement

Related:

HEALTH CARE

So today was a victory for the rule of law, as it repudiates the overbearing policies of an imperial presidency by enforcing the provisions of the Constitution. May it be the first of many as Americans seek to reclaim their constitutional rights.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos