Hegseth Responded Perfectly to the Libs' Uproar Over Our Air Campaign Against Narco-Terror...
Walk, Don't Run, Concerning This Latest Development About the J6 Pipe Bomb Suspect
Lawmaker Under Fire for Representing Somalia Instead of Her Constituents
Supreme Court Just Agreed to Rule on This Controversial Immigration-Related Executive Orde...
Yes, Richard Gere, Illegal Immigrants Are (D)ifferent
Check Out What This Chinese Communist Agent Said About NY Governor Kathy Hochul
The Media's Latest Defense of Minnesota's Somali Community Fails Basic Math
Green New Deal Countdown: Ocasio-Cortez Stays Silent Amid Retreat of Climate Alarmism
JD Vance Blasts 'Bullsh*t Narrative’ Blaming Trump Administration for Biden’s Economy
The Book (and the Monk) Behind the Pope
Two Illinois Brothers Indicted in $293M COVID Testing Fraud Scheme
Woman Charged With Smuggling Aliens Through Canada
Maxine Waters Calls Trump a Killer For Destroying NarcoTerrorists
ATMs Help Trace $250K Unemployment Fraud Scheme to Michigan Government Employee and Partne...
Prosecutors: Ex-Contractors Wiped 96 Government Databases in Retaliatory Plot
Tipsheet

Hey, Got $50 For a Light Bulb?

I suggest stocking up on normal, cheap, 100-watt light bulbs now because the new, government mandated 100-Watt LED bulbs are going to cost consumers $50 a piece. The
Advertisement
average household has 42 light bulbs in it, bringing the cost to outfit your home with the new bulbs to $2100...that's before you even turn them on or pay an electricity bill. Greenies and government nannies will argue that in the long run, $50 light bulbs actually save money and energy because they don't have to be replaced as often, however, that's if you can afford to purchase them in the first place. Also, these new and improved bulbs aren't as "energy efficient" and don't last as long as the government would like consumers to believe

Two leading makers of lighting products are showcasing LED bulbs that are bright enough to replace 100-watt light bulbs set to disappear from stores in January.


Their demonstrations at the LightFair trade show in Philadelphia this week mean that brighter LED bulbs will likely go on sale next year, but after a government ban takes effect.


The new bulbs will also be expensive — about $50 each — so the development may not prevent consumers from hoarding traditional bulbs.


To encourage energy efficiency, Congress passed a law in 2007 mandating that bulbs producing 100 watts worth of light meet certain efficiency goals, starting in 2012. Conventional light bulbs don't meet those goals, so the law will prohibit making or importing them. The same rule will start apply to remaining bulbs 40 watts and above in 2014. Since January, California has already banned stores from restocking 100-watt incandescent bulbs.

Advertisement


LEDs are efficient, durable and produced in great quantities, but they're still expensive. An LED bulb can contain a dozen light-emitting diodes, or tiny semiconductor chips, which cost about $1 each.


The big problem with LEDs is that although they don't produce as much heat as incandescent bulbs, the heat they do create shortens the lifespan and reduces the efficiency of the chips. Cramming a dozen chips together in a tight bulb-shaped package that fits in today's lamps and sockets makes the heat problem worse. The brighter the bulb, the bigger the problem is.



Senator Rand Paul explains:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement