CNN Host Highlights What Maine Dems Are Bracing for Regarding Graham Platner
Meet the Pair of Socialists Who Recruited Graham Platner. You Can See How...
You Won't Believe What This Former Platner Staffer Said About His Campaign
Alaska's Democratic 'Decoy' Senate Candidate's Son's Suspicious Ties Just Got Exposed
This Intruder Broke Into an Armed Homeowner's Residence and Immediately Regretted It
This GOP Holdout Is Now on Board With the SAVE America Act
Embedded Evil
Qintel Puts Pittsburgh on the Map for Cyber Intelligence
Roy Cooper Is Blaming Washington DC for Rising Energy Costs. His Own Record...
The SPLC Is Being Grilled on Capitol Hill—Watch Jim Jordan Accuse Them of...
Gavin Newsom Has a Solution to California's Election Process. And It's Exactly What...
JD Vance Calls Out California's Election System As Public Scrutiny Mounts
Seattle Schools Are Hiding Children's 'Gender Identity' Changes From Parents, and It's Leg...
Trump Vows Response to Iran Shooting Down American Helicopter
Sickening: African Migrant Brutally Stabs, Attempts to Decapitate Man in Belfast
Tipsheet

The gubernatorial Senate?

The gubernatorial Senate?
With the recent death of Senator Ted Kennedy, many are debating whether or not the Massachusetts legislature should give Governor Deval Patrick the opportunity to appoint someone temporarily to fill Kennedy's position. Kennedy was against the governor being able to make such an appointment in 2004 but he supported the idea earlier this year. Now that the Senate seat is vacant though, there does seem to be some momentum behind changing the law in Massachusetts, partly because of the important health care debate on Capitol Hill and partly because of Patrick's recent advocacy for this change in the law.
Advertisement


Interestingly enough, a recent Washington Post editorial noted how much of a role gubernatorial appointments have had in the Senate in 2009. With at least one new gubernatorial appointment expected soon (in Texas), the Post noted that "you get 26.6 percent of Americans represented by a senator for whom no one voted. If Massachusetts is added to that roster, the proportion bumps up to 28.7 percent. This is undemocratic and shouldn't continue." With the importance of upcoming legislation in the Senate, 28.7 is a huge percentage of the population who are represented by a Senator they did not even vote for.

From New York to Florida to Illinois to Delaware, voters are being represented in the Senate by an appointed official, not an elected representative. 

Although some gubernatorial appointments are to be expected, especially because of a new administration in Washington that has asked several Senators to take roles in that administration, such appointments are now playing a major role in the Senate that could be voting on liberal health care reform this fall. It is unclear whether or not a temporary successor will be chosen for Kennedy in Massachusetts before the special election is held. What is abudantly clear, though, is the large role that governors have (for better or for worse) played in deciding the current composition of the United States Senate at a time when major issues like health care reform and energy legislation are being debated and discussed.
Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement