It’s Their Own Fault We No Longer Default to Respect
Did This Issue Catapult Japanese Conservatives to a Landslide Win in Their Elections?
US Women's Hockey Team Clubbed the Canadians Like Baby Seals Yesterday. Oh, and...
Lisa Murkowski Just Stabbed Her Party in the Back on the SAVE Act
Why This Girl Wrestler Had Shock and Horror All Over Her Face? It's...
Bill Maher Reveals Why He Got the COVID Vaccine...and He's Rather Annoyed About...
Iran Is Preparing for a US Airstrike – Here's What Trump Is Saying
Man's Best Friend: Mystery Dog Helps Louisville Police Find Missing Toddler
Sen. Alex Padilla Gets Dragged for Sharing a Letter From Detained Migrant Child
The January Jobs Report Is Here
TX State Rep. Harrison Calls for Gene Wu to Be Stripped of Committee...
Check Out This Ridiculous Axios Headline About Plummeting Crime Rates
Police Released Person of Interest Detained in Guthrie Disappearance. Here's What We Know.
Report: The FAA Closed El Paso Airspace After Mexican Cartel Drone Incursion; Airspace...
Steve Hilton Promises a ‘Political Revolution’ in California, And He’s Leading the Polls
Tipsheet

FDA Nannies Target Artificial Food Coloring

The New York Times reports that the FDA is revisiting its stance on artificial food coloring. Government officials are concerned that artificial dyes exacerbate hyperactivity in children who already have behavioral problems.
Advertisement


After staunchly defending the safety of artificial food colorings, the federal government is for the first time publicly reassessing whether foods like Jell-O, Lucky Charms cereal and Minute Maid Lemonade should carry warnings that the bright artificial colorings in them worsen behavior problems like hyperactivity in some children.

The Food and Drug Administration concluded long ago that there was no definitive link between the colorings and behavior or health problems, and the agency is unlikely to change its mind any time soon. But on Wednesday and Thursday, the F.D.A. will ask a panel of experts to review the evidence and advise on possible policy changes, which could include warning labels on food.

In a concluding report, staff scientists from the F.D.A. wrote that while typical children might be unaffected by the dyes, those with behavioral disorders might have their conditions “exacerbated by exposure to a number of substances in food, including, but not limited to, synthetic color additives.”

Renee Shutters, a mother of two from Jamestown, N.Y., said in a telephone interview on Tuesday that two years ago, her son Trenton, then 5, was having serious behavioral problems at school until she eliminated artificial food colorings from his diet. “I know for sure I found the root cause of this one because you can turn it on and off like a switch,” Ms. Shutters said.

Advertisement

Since when do artificial foods need a warning label? Are parents really that inept that they need the government to warn them about possible side effects of feeding their kids junk food? The anecdote in the Times story seems to suggest otherwise. Ms. Shutters told reporters that she noticed her child's behavior without the help of the FDA, and made appropriate changes. If a parent can't handle this, then we have a lot more to worry about than artificial dyes in processed food.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement