Kash Patel Becomes the Focus of Media Analysis They Consistently Get Wrong
How America Has Destroyed Its Democracy, Part Two: The Aristocracy of Merit
Three Congressional Missteps on Healthcare
Today’s Qualifications to Be President of the U.S.
Climate Alarmists Howl After EPA Rescinds ‘Endangerment Finding’
Three Iranian Nationals Indicted For Attempting to Sell Google Secrets to Home Country
Ukraine's Bureaucrats Are Finishing What China Started
Rising Federal Debt: Why Strategic Planning Matters More Than Ever for High-Net-Worth Fami...
Classroom Political Activism Shifts a Teacher’s Role from Educator to Indoctrinator
As America Celebrates 250, We Must Help Iran Celebrate Another 2,500
Guatemalan Citizen Admits Using Stolen Identity to Obtain Custody of Teen Migrant
Oregon-Based Utility PacifiCorp Settles for $575M Over Six Devastating Wildfires
Armed Man Rammed Substation Near Las Vegas in Apparent Terror Plot Before Committing...
DOJ Moves to Strip U.S. Citizenship From Former North Miami Mayor Over Immigration...
DOJ Probes Three Michigan School Districts That Allegedly Teach Gender Ideology
Tipsheet

National vs. State Polls: Clinton Will Cruise, or is One State Away From Losing

National vs. State Polls: Clinton Will Cruise, or is One State Away From Losing

The final national polls are all in, and the consensus seems to be that Hillary Clinton is en route to a modest victory tonight. The last batch of numbers from CBS News, Fox News, YouGov, NBC/WSJ, and Washington Post/ABC all peg her lead at four points (while a handful have Trump ahead, or Clinton leading by a larger margin). If recent history is any guide, the last outfit on that list could be telling. With the exception of 2000, that particular pollster has demonstrated an uncanny knack for basically nailing the eventual outcome in its final survey prior to the election:

Advertisement

That's a damn good track record, and Allahpundit rightly notes that 2000's misfire could easily have been attributable to the last minute oppo dump about George W. Bush's DUI.  But if Hillary is really up by four points nationally, she should have a fair amount of breathing room in the electoral college math.  Does she?  Ehhhhh, not if this is all correct:

As McCormack notes in that tweet -- and Leah mentioned this morning -- if everything you see there turns out to be accurate, Trump is just four electoral votes shy of winning the presidency. And he's down by less than a point in New Hampshire, home to...exactly four electoral votes.  On the flip side, if Clinton's vaunted ground game helps push her over the top in Nevada and Florida, she cruises to a 300+ electoral vote victory.  As we've explained on a number of occasions, the data points to a Clinton win, because Trump's hill is so steep.  There are counter-theories as to why the data may be wrong, many focusing on some variation of the polls "missing" millions of Trump supporters.  We'll see which argument is vindicated by the actual results in a few hours.  I'll leave you with this quick clip from my election preview segment on Fox this morning.  Two big factors suggest that 2016 should be ripe for a 'change election' outcome.  Along with Hillary Clinton's deep unpopularity, these are part of the reason why Trump is still in this thing:

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement