Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
US Attorney Asks Judge to Dismiss Indictment Against Steve Bannon
Jasmine Crockett Shows Just How Low Democrats Are Willing to Go to Attack...
A Boy Has Stolen Another Girls' Championship Title
Dozens of Detransitioners Have Filed Lawsuits, and the Costs Could End 'Gender-Affirming C...
While Homeless New Yorkers Freeze, the NYT Wants Us to Know This About...
Sen. Warren Repeats Debunked Lie About Women and the SAVE Act
We Must Not Submit to 'Diversity'
A Maryland Squatter Walks Free — and Here's What Her Attorney Had...
AWFUL Who Harassed Yoga Studio Employees Over ICE Earned Herself a Ban
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
Trump Targets Obama’s Climate 'Endangerment Finding' in Sweeping Rollback of Emissions Rul...
Steve Hilton Isn’t Even Governor Yet, and He’s Already Exposing California Welfare Fraud
Tipsheet

National vs. State Polls: Clinton Will Cruise, or is One State Away From Losing

The final national polls are all in, and the consensus seems to be that Hillary Clinton is en route to a modest victory tonight. The last batch of numbers from CBS News, Fox News, YouGov, NBC/WSJ, and Washington Post/ABC all peg her lead at four points (while a handful have Trump ahead, or Clinton leading by a larger margin). If recent history is any guide, the last outfit on that list could be telling. With the exception of 2000, that particular pollster has demonstrated an uncanny knack for basically nailing the eventual outcome in its final survey prior to the election:

Advertisement

That's a damn good track record, and Allahpundit rightly notes that 2000's misfire could easily have been attributable to the last minute oppo dump about George W. Bush's DUI.  But if Hillary is really up by four points nationally, she should have a fair amount of breathing room in the electoral college math.  Does she?  Ehhhhh, not if this is all correct:

As McCormack notes in that tweet -- and Leah mentioned this morning -- if everything you see there turns out to be accurate, Trump is just four electoral votes shy of winning the presidency. And he's down by less than a point in New Hampshire, home to...exactly four electoral votes.  On the flip side, if Clinton's vaunted ground game helps push her over the top in Nevada and Florida, she cruises to a 300+ electoral vote victory.  As we've explained on a number of occasions, the data points to a Clinton win, because Trump's hill is so steep.  There are counter-theories as to why the data may be wrong, many focusing on some variation of the polls "missing" millions of Trump supporters.  We'll see which argument is vindicated by the actual results in a few hours.  I'll leave you with this quick clip from my election preview segment on Fox this morning.  Two big factors suggest that 2016 should be ripe for a 'change election' outcome.  Along with Hillary Clinton's deep unpopularity, these are part of the reason why Trump is still in this thing:

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos