Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
A Bar Patron Had a Total Meltdown During the Super Bowl. The Reason...
Maybe We Should Be Glad Bad Bunny Performed in Spanish
Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
Let’s Rip Democrats Apart for Fun (and Because They’re Truly Awful)
Faith, Not Foul-Mouthed Scolds, Shined at the Grammys
Is There Any Good News Out There?
Has There Been Voter Fraud?
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Talks About Talks: How Tehran Is Buying Time While Washington Hesitates
Girl Scout Cookies vs. the Inverted Food Pyramid
SBA Prioritizes American Citizens for New Loans
Tipsheet

Video: Hagel Admits Released Detainees Directed and Planned Attacks Against US Troops


I say "admits" because the Secretary of Defense did a lot of tap dancing to avoid stating the obvious during his testimony yesterday: That these Taliban commanders were, in fact, at war with America. Under questioning from Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-TX), Hagel engaged in intensive hair-splitting on everything from the exact terminology surrounding Bowe Bergdahl's captivity, to the technical definition of negotiating with terrorists, to whether or not the 'Taliban Five' directly took part in attacks against Americans. The key bit comes near the end of this clip:

Advertisement



Hagel: "We have no direct evidence of any direct involvement in their direct attacks on the United States, or any of our troops. They were part of the Taliban at the time...But yes, they were combatants."

Thornberry: "So your point was they didn't pull the trigger, but they were senior commanders of the Taliban military who directed operations against the United States and its coalition partners..."

Hagel: "That's right. That's right. As I said in my statement, they were combatants."


If that was his contention all along, why all the tortured parsing about "direct" evidence of "direct" involvement in "direct" attacks? Perhaps he was trying to downplay the danger these freed detainees really pose, a la Hillary Clinton's bizarre assertion that the 'Taliban Five' are not a threat to Americans -- in spite of their high-risk designation, our intelligence community's candid assessments, and the continued presence of US troops in Afghanistan. (Mrs. Clinton's approval rating has dropped precipitously in recent years, incidentally). Current and former cabinet secretaries may not be willing to articulate this deal's inherent perils for political reasons, but the American people seem to have internalized it on their own. A two-thirds majority expressed concerns about the implications of negotiating with terrorists in a freshly-released poll, even as Hagel denies that any such precedent was set. In fact, he continues to recite the party line the US government didn't negotiate with terrorists at all, since our direct talks were with Qatari intermediaries. This distinction is meaningless. We forged a deal with, and made major concessions to, the Taliban and the Haqqani network, the latter of which is officially classified as a terrorist organization by our government. The Obama administration's sophistry on this point has been betrayed by their own excuses on other fronts. When queried about the nature of the connection between the Taliban and Haqqani, Hagel said he didn't know -- which became a theme of his entire performance:

Advertisement


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos