Thank You, Indiana RINOS...for Being Totally Worthless
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Wallops CNN During Briefing
Another Grand Jury Declines to Indict Letitia James
Lefty Influencer Inserts Foot Straight Into Mouth After Defending Socialism
Did Wes Moore Lie About His Academic Career?
Trump Administration Official Demonstrates Just How Dangerous Biden's Policies Were
National Nonprofits Call for Healthcare Pricing Transparency
Woke Alert: Consumers' Research Sounds the Alarm on the Leftist Takeover at the...
Check Out Rep. McBride's Vulgar Dismissal of Massive Obamacare Fraud
Things Are So Bad in San Francisco, Residents Are Forced to Take Drastic...
Republicans Were Right. Socialized Medicine Leads to Death Panels.
Indiana Senate Majority Leader Gives Fiery Speech In Defense of Redistricting
Introducing the AI Civil Rights Act: Solving Imaginary Problems With Terrible Solutions
South Carolina Businessman Charged in Alleged $1.2M COVID Relief Fraud Scheme
Texas Lawmaker's Push to Impeach Trump Fails
Tipsheet

Left-leaning Pundit on 2016: "Democrats Should be Very Worried"

Van Jones, who once advised the president and is now a co-host on CNN’s Crossfire, recently had a few words of caution for Democrats giddy about 2016 (via The Blaze):

Advertisement

Jones illustrates two reasons why Democrats should be less-than-enthused about the 2016 primary season: The obvious diversity—and star power—of the opposition party. “This is going to be the greatest show on earth,” he contends. Some of us, however, might disagree with this characterization, but he’s right that Democrats are not fielding candidates that are terribly inspiring. In fact, they are already looking for someone who can effectively challenge Hillary Clinton as the early frontrunner. So far, their hopes have been in vain.

While Jones certainly does have a point about a burgeoning "rainbow coalition" of "superstars"—few Republicans would argue that the 2016 field is weaker than four years ago—this is a double-edged sword. Part of the problem with an overcrowded, talented field is that candidates will need to fight harder—and perhaps play dirtier—to appeal to Republican primarygoers. This of course could be a recipe for disaster. Imagine, for instance, Hillary Clinton securing the nomination relatively early on while Republicans make mincemeat of each other for months on end. Will this not damage their brand overall, at least in the eyes of moderate and centrist voters? It will feel like 2012 all over again.

Advertisement

Still, I suppose having too many good candidates in the running is a better problem to have than too few. Right?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement