HelloFresh Had a Peculiar Post for Pride Month. It Caused an Uproar
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Absolutely Bodied Mikie Sherrill for Lying About ICE Detent...
Here's Who's Suing to Stop Trump's America 250 Event
Wait, Did a Dem Senator Really Say This Regarding Justifying Support for Graham...
Bill Maher: Artists Fleeing America 250 Concert Makes It Seem Like They Hate...
And This Is Why No One Watches the WNBA Part 675
Scott Jennings Says Ballot Harvesting Should Be Punted Into the Sun
NY Congressional Candidate Pushed COVID Theory Pushed by China, and She Just Might...
Zohran Mamdani Has an Historically Illiterate Take on Soccer
Does Anybody Have the Answers?
Donald J. Trumpberger
Spencer Pratt Loses His Bid For Los Angeles Mayor
You Can’t Fake Real
When Students Rise, Tyrants Tremble
The Housing Market Needs President Trump’s Solutions
Tipsheet

In Defense of Marco Rubio’s Endorsement

In Defense of Marco Rubio’s Endorsement

Ever since Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) endorsed Republican frontrunner Mitt Romney last night on Sean Hannity’s show, my twitter timeline has been overflowing with angry tweets rebuking the Florida Senator for “selling out” conservatives. By their estimation, Mitt Romney is -- at best -- a moderate Republican who doesn’t represent the values of conservative America. While this may be true in some respects, I think it’s fatuous to say – or even imply – that Rubio has betrayed his constituents and supporters.

Advertisement

First of all, do those same individuals casting aspersions have any idea why he endorsed Mitt Romney in the first place? Put simply, Rubio explained in a recent interview that President Obama’s offhand comments to Dmitry Medvedev, in which he explicitly stated that he would have more “flexibility” to negotiate with Russia after his “last” election, were deeply disturbing. In essence, President Obama was suggesting that if elected to a second term, he would make concessions to the Kremlin that would otherwise be politically unpopular in an election year. All things considered, this course of action could jeopardize the national security interests of the United States. And so, failing to nominate a candidate who has the qualifications, experience, and above all, the appeal to galvanize voters will virtually ensure President Obama’s reelection. Following this logic, the best way to maintain a strong foreign policy and protect American lives is to nominate – and subsequently elect – Mitt Romney.

Indeed, some will argue that his decision was contrived and opportunistic. However, let us not forget that while a brokered convention (the only possible way the remaining three candidates can clinch the nomination) would certainly make for interesting politics, it does little to prepare the Republican nominee for the fall campaign. In fact, as some argue, it may have devastating consequences. Basic math suggests that Rick Santorum – the most viable Romney alternative – cannot garner the requisite 1144 delegates. Moreover, according to a recent poll, he’s in danger of losing his native state. Rubio argues, in other words, that the Republican primary has gone on long enough and that the party can – and should – coalesce around a single candidate. (Incidentally, he is not the first person to do say this publicly, but that’s beside the point). In the end, obviously, Rubio believes that candidate is Mitt Romney.

Advertisement

To put it bluntly, the former Massachusetts governor will be the 2012 Republican nominee barring a political earthquake. Furthermore, most fair-minded individuals – including Senator Rubio – acknowledge this reality.

It's astounding that this is still controversial.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos