Why Kamala's Interview With a Muslim Influencer Went Off the Rails
One Dearborn Voter's Damning Observation About Kamala
This Video Out of California Shows Why Voter ID Laws Are Necessary
The Liberal Media Is Seething Right Now Heading Into Election Day
Is It Too Early to Talk 2028?
Trump Unveils New Proposal to Tackle Border Crisis
The NYT Has a Big Problem on Its Hands Heading Into Election Day
RFK Jr.'s Final Pitch: 'Do NOT Vote for Me'
Go Vote: GOP Senator Predicts What the Country Would Look Like After the...
Trump's Closing Message to Voters
Trump Already Won
As Voters Go to the Polls, What Does Kamala Harris Actually Believe?
Half of Gen Z Voters Say They Lied About Who They Voted for...
Texas Tells DOJ Election Monitors to Pound Sand
The Elites Are About to Hand Trump a Second Term
Tipsheet

'That's Not Fair': Hillary Pushes Back at Chris Wallace For Noting She Never Mentioned Terrorism in Benghazi Remarks at Andrews Base

In Hillary Clinton's first sit down interview since becoming the 2016 Democratic nominee, Fox News Sunday's Chris Wallace confronted her with some tough questions about her misleading the American public about the terror attack in Benghazi. Particularly, Wallace pointed out that her remarks at Joint Base Andrews following the September 11, 2012 attack did not feature the word "terrorism."
Advertisement

"That's not fair," Clinton responded.

If you look at her whole speech, she insisted, you'd see that she quoted others who had talked about terrorism and that she had made clear prior to her speech that the Benghazi ambush was terrorism.

"There was no doubt it was terrorism," she concluded.

The confusion that arose from her remarks were "exploited" by the media, she said.

In another puzzling exchange in which Clinton refused to face reality, Wallace asked Clinton about FBI Director James Comey's assessment of her email use, which he called "careless." Clinton claimed his remarks were "consistent" with what she's told the American people. Namely, that she never sent or received classified intel. That, however, is not what Comey told the 

Clinton claims she read the entire transcript of Comey's remarks, yet how closely remains to be seen. In his testimony, Comey clearly contradicted Clinton's claim to innocence in regards to the mishandling of classified emails.

It is dismissive answers like these that help explain why Clinton's trustworthy numbers are so low.

(H/T America Rising)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement