Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Did You See the Plaques of the Former Presidents on Trump's Wall of...
Why Nick Reiner Will Plead Not Guilty in Murder of His Parents
When the Memes Are Pouring in Regarding the Epstein Files, You Know the...
NY Times Deep Epstein File Exposé Exposed Little, and Using Drug Boats to...
Hey, Vendors, You're Asking Too Much of Your Customers
Is Germany’s AfD a Libertarian Party?
Juries, Not Politicians, Will Soon Decide the Fate of Child-Harming Social Media Platforms
California’s Dependence on ACA Subsidies Shows Just How Fragile the Entire Obamacare Model...
Bernie Sanders’ Data Center Ban Would Cripple America and Empower China
Affordability and the Green New Liars
The End of the Autopen Presidency and the Return of American Exceptionalism
Taking Stock of President Trump’s Executive Order on Shareholder Proxy Voting
Louisiana Man Arrested for Allegedly Threatening ICE Officers, DOJ Says
Prosecutors Say $368M Bitcoin Theft Fueled Lavish Lifestyle Across U.S.
Tipsheet

White House Admits Obama's ISIS Strategy Is Prolonging War

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest admitted Wednesday that President Obama's refusal to commit more ground troops to the fight against the Islamic State is prolonging the war.

Advertisement

"The other reason this is going to take awhile," Earnest said at the daily press briefing, "is that the president does not believe it is in the interest of the United States for us to commit all of our military resources to going in and solving this problem for the Iraqi people or for the Syrian people."

"The United States has the bravest most well equipped best trained fighting force in the world," Earnest continued. "It is a logical assumption that if U.S. military resources were committed and we were going to go in there and do this on our own, that the timeline would be shorter."

Obama is currently seeking an affirmation from Congress for his strategy against the Islamic State, even though the vast majority of the American people believe Obama has no strategy.

The White House has framed the resolution they are seeking from Congress as a "Authorization for Use of Military Force." But the White House again stressed Wednesday that Obama believes the existing 2001 AUMF already gives him every authorization he needs to fight the Islamic State.

Advertisement

Asked to confirm that the White House believes a failure by Congress to pass Obama's new AUMF would have "no practical impact" on his exercise of force, Earnest replied, "Well the president does believe that he has the authority that he needs to order the military actions that have already taken place. So the answer to your question is 'yes' because the president believes the Congress has already given him this authority."

Obama's AUMF does repeal the 2002 AUMF that President Bush secured from Congress before his war in Iraq, but it does nothing to change, limit, or repeal the 2001 AUMF that Bush secured before his war in Afghanistan.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement