The House Homeland Security Committee With the CBP and ICE Chiefs Was a...
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
DOJ Charges Two Men in $120 Million Adult Day Care Fraud Scheme
This GOP Governor Just Shot Down a Bill That Would Have Banned Biological...
This Is How Mike Johnson Will Stop Lawmakers From Challenging Trump's Tariffs
While Her Senate Rivals Campaign Statewide, Haley Stevens Hides From Voters
Wisconsin High School Is Hosting a Drag Show. Guess Who's Participating.
You Are the Carbon They Want to Reduce: WEF 'Sustainability' Leftist Wants to...
FBI Releases Images of Suspect in Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping
Latest Leftist Stupid: Trump Abolished Second Amendment
Dow 50,000: A Supply-Side Miracle
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
Even Jimmy Kimmel Is Mocking the Left for Their Sudden Love of Bad...
Welcome to California: Inside CA's Homelessness Crisis With Nick Shirley
This Congressman's Inquiry Into Bad Bunny's Explicit Performance Has the Libs Screaming
Tipsheet

Op-Ed Says That 'To Kill A Mockingbird' Might Teach Kids Sexual Assault Survivors Lie

NBC has published an op-ed with a rather interesting take on the Mississippi school district's decision to eliminate the book "To Kill A Mockingbird" from its curriculum. According to the author, the book probably shouldn't be discussed in classrooms, as it could "complicate the modern 'believe victims' movement." In the book, a character named Mayella Ewell, who is white, falsely accuses Tom Robinson, who is black, of raping her. Robinson is convicted of rape even when it becomes clear he is innocent of any crime. 

Advertisement

This, according to the op-ed, is problematic and could teach students that sometimes women lie about rape.  

And the book cannot continue to be taught as if every person in the classroom is white, upper middle class and needs to be prodded into being Scout. It should be taught by asking questions about why there are no black characters with agency in the novel, by wrapping it in with the history of the Scottsboro boys — a group of black teenagers falsely accused of raping two white women — and through raising questions about how "Mockingbird" (and American history) complicates the modern “believe victims” movement.

I'll concede that there are good points in the piece--the characters aren't exactly the most developed, and it's a relatively black-and-white book (in the metaphorical sense, not literal) when the real world is much more gray. There are certainly better books out there that would probably do a better job teaching the same lessons found in "Mockingbird," but one can't ignore the book's status as an American classic. 

Further, it's entirely possible to both support women who have been sexually assaulted and to read "To Kill a Mockingbird" in class. For one, "To Kill a Mockingbird" is a work of fiction. Sexual assault happens, but I hope schoolchildren are learning in a place other than an English classroom about what they should do if someone they know claims to have been sexually assaulted. It's also the sad truth that people sometimes lie about these things. (But again, English class isn't exactly the place where this discussion should be happening.) Treat fiction like fiction, not as a guide for life. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos