FINALLY: The DHS Shutdown Is Coming to an End...Sort of
This Reporter Was Left With Severe Burns After Asking Trump This Question About...
Animal Rights Movement Seeks to Jail Hunters and Fishermen With This Measure
WaPo Goes on Defense for Eric Swalwell...for Some Reason, and NY Times Brags...
President Trump Has Already Won on Birthright Citizenship
You Won’t Believe Justice Jackson’s Arguments Against Ending Birthright Citizenship
In Today's NBA, Beliefs Can Be a Firing Offense
Trump: Iran Conflict Objectives Are 'Nearing Completion'
Tiny Store, Massive Fraud: Boston Shop Owner Convicted of Trafficking Nearly $7M in...
Artemis II Blasts Off, Marking America’s Return to Deep Space
Judge Revokes Naturalization of Married Couple Who Allegedly Conspired to Steal Medical Tr...
New Report Alleges $180 Billion Stolen from California Public Programs
Five Indicted in $511K Missouri Childcare Fraud Scheme
Ex-Staffer Blows Whistle on Michigan U.S. Senate Candidate’s Foreign Policy Views
Massachusetts Man Charged With Threatening President Trump on Facebook
Tipsheet

NARAL Colorado Not Fans of Bill That Would Criminalize the Murder of a Fetus

NARAL Colorado Not Fans of Bill That Would Criminalize the Murder of a Fetus

The nation was stunned by the vicious assault on Michelle Wilkins, a 26-year-old woman in Colorado whose unborn child was ripped from her womb while she answered a Craigslist ad for baby clothes. Even though her unborn child was killed in the attack, the attacker, Dynel Lane, would not face murder charges as it was uncertain whether or not the infant was alive outside of the womb. People were furious with this development, and a YouGov poll showed that vast majorities of people say that they feel the attack should have been classified as a murder. Colorado's legislature is considering the "Crimes Against Pregnant Women Act," which would allow for murder charges to be filed in a case like the attack on Wilkins.

Advertisement

Apparently the people of NARAL Colorado are not among the 76 percent who think that the attack was more than an assault. Earlier today, they tweeted this:

Call me crazy, but I'm not seeing how this is exactly a bad thing. Even trying to see the bill from the point of view held by NARAL's employees, I'm at a loss as to how someone could be against a murder charge for someone who literally ripped open a woman's body to extract her baby during an assault. This isn't even close to the same thing as a woman going in for an abortion--this was an assault that resulted in the death of a person.

NARAL Colorado followed up their tweet with this one, which didn't do much to explain their point of view:

Again, this simply isn't true. Wilkins' infant was seven months along, and had the baby been born in a hospital instead of in a bathtub following a botched Cesarian section, he would probably still be alive today. Despite this life that was snuffed out, Lane won't be charged with murder because Colorado law won't allow this. That's absurd.

Advertisement

Related:

COLORADO

It's also interesting that NARAL chose to use the term "mother" in their first tweet. What, pray tell, is the woman a mother of if (in NARAL's view) they are not a person until they are born?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement