Don't Fall for the Latest Lib Media Narrative on Trump
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Is Waiting for This Story From the Media
Illegal Alien Who Snatched DHS Secretary Kristi Noem's Purse Has Been Identified
What a Brutal Way to Lose a Baseball Game
Just Bomb Iran Already
Republicans Should Strip Nancy Pelosi of Her Title
Apparently, Blood Isn't Thicker Than Politics
Dear, Larry, Curb Your Trump Derangement Syndrome
What Americans Can Learn From 'Based' Azerbaijan
'Colorado Springs Is Waking Up to a Safer Community,' DEA Says After Latest...
What Is a Sanctuary City...or State?
Why Are the Democrats So Desperate?
Does Donald Trump Have Enough Time to Enact His Program?
In Honor of Virginia Giuffre, Release Epstein Files Now
Democrats Have Nothing on President Donald Trump Except Spin and Lies
Tipsheet

We Have an Update on Joe Biden's Autopen Use. It's Not Good.

Mandel Ngan/Pool via AP

It’s not a new controversy because Barack Obama used it, but he was mentally fit to be president; Joe Biden was not. There are still some questions regarding its constitutionality, but the use of the autopen under Joe Biden has come under new scrutiny. The reason is simple and unsurprising: a top aide might have abused it (via NY Post):

Advertisement


A key aide to former President Joe Biden may have exceeded their authority by liberally using an autopen to sign official documents, according to two former White House sources, as President Trump’s aides set up “far more restrictive” rules governing the use of the mechanical device. 

A document obtained by The Post outlines the narrow set of circumstances in which Trump’s signature can be affixed to documents, following controversy this week kicked off by a Heritage Foundation analysis of Biden signatures on various records, including last-minute pardons. 

A small group of officials under both Biden and Trump have been delegated the power to get documents “signed” robotically, but 82-year-old Biden’s perceived cognitive decline sparked debate about whether some aides may have assumed his wishes in his final stretch as commander-in-chief. 

One Biden White House source told The Post they suspect that a key aide to the then-president may have made unilateral determinations on what to auto-sign. The Post is not publishing that staffer’s name due to the lack of concrete evidence and refutations by other colleagues. 

The Biden aide, who did not respond to requests for comment, would frequently make mention of what “the boss” wanted, the source said, but compatriots would have “no idea” if it was true because the internal culture was to not ask questions. 

[…] 

“Everyone” was suspicious of this individual exceeding their authority when claiming to speak for the president, the source said. “But no one would actually say it.” 

“I think [the aide] was using the autopen as standard and past protocol,” The Post’s informant said. 

“There is no clarity on who actually approved what — POTUS or [the aide].”

A second Biden White House source agreed that the person was suspected of assuming the then-president’s positions and handing down orders without it being clear if they actually had communicated with the commander-in-chief. 

Advertisement

It brings us back to our favorite question regarding the Biden White House: who was in charge? After the June debate, where Biden imploded on CNN before a national audience, which killed his re-election operation, Hunter Biden was supposedly running the White House and sitting in on sensitive meetings without a security clearance. Now, we have an alleged rogue aide used the autopen with murky approval from the president. 

Talk about king chaos, folks. Let’s wait and see only because anonymous sources aren’t what they used to be. We can thank an overzealous and incompetent anti-Trump clown in the media discrediting this form of confirmation.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement