We Have the Results of Trump's Cognitive Score
Why the Washington Nationals Just Fired One of Their Executives. Hint: It's Woke...
Japan Overhauled Its Entire Intelligence Community...and One Nation Is Not Happy About It
NY Gov Tried to Dunk on Trump About the Knicks, and Failed Miserably
Why This Milwaukee Brewers Pitcher Got a One-Game Suspension. It Was Pretty Damn...
Jefferson on How to Restore the Republic
Pollsters Are Underestimating Trump 10 Years Later. What Might It Mean for the...
The Push by Democrats to Ban One of the Commonly Owned Handguns in...
How AI Threatens to Destroy the Core Self and How to Fight Back
Mission Laundering: What the OpenAI Verdict Didn't Resolve
Germany's Bureaucracy Crisis: How Red Tape Is Costing the Economy €146 Billion a...
The Real AI Risk Isn’t Regulation. It’s Strategic Blindness.
America Is Sleepwalking Toward Q-Day While Cybercriminals Prepare for the Future
Putin’s Efforts to Subvert Armenia’s Elections Can Harm US Interests
The Deal to Keep the Islamic Republic Alive
Tipsheet

The Truth About Libya Comes Out . . .

The Truth About Libya Comes Out . . .

New information from Reuters makes it absolutely clear how much deliberate prevarication and dishonesty there was emanating from The White House and the State Department in the wake of the Benghazi attacks.

Advertisement

The whole story is here.

In a nutshell, Reuters reports that The White House was told within two hours of the attack that Al Qaeda linked militants (or militant Al Qaeda sympathizers) were claiming "credit" for the attacks that resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others.  An email identifying the group claiming responsibility for the attack was sent to addresses including The White House Situation Room, where the President was, no more than 2.5 hours after the attack.

Granted, as the story is careful to note, not all intelligence accounts can be immediately credited as automatically accurate in these situations. But what is so shocking about the email Reuters has obtained is that it means that the administration's repeated characterizations of the attack as "spontaneous"demonstrations in response to a YouTube video -- for two full weeks thereafter -- were knowingly, hideously false, misleading and incomplete.

What a scandal.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos