Norwegian Olympian: I Won the Bronze. Also, I Cheated on My Girlfriend
Did This Issue Catapult Japanese Conservatives to a Landslide Win in Their Elections?
US Women's Hockey Team Clubbed the Canadians Like Baby Seals Yesterday. Oh, and...
Senate Democrats Are Gearing Up for a Fight to Protect Sanctuary Cities
Iran Is Preparing for a US Airstrike – Here's What Trump Is Saying
Antifa Is Now Targeting Moderate Congressional Democrats in Washington State
Man's Best Friend: Mystery Dog Helps Louisville Police Find Missing Toddler
Sen. Alex Padilla Gets Dragged for Sharing a Letter From Detained Migrant Child
The January Jobs Report Is Here
TX State Rep. Harrison Calls for Gene Wu to Be Stripped of Committee...
Check Out This Ridiculous Axios Headline About Plummeting Crime Rates
Police Released Person of Interest Detained in Guthrie Disappearance. Here's What We Know.
Report: The FAA Closed El Paso Airspace After Mexican Cartel Drone Incursion; Airspace...
Justice Jackson Defends Her Grammys Appearance As 'Part of the Job'
Steve Hilton Promises a ‘Political Revolution’ in California, and He’s Leading in the...
Tipsheet

The Long and Short of the Super Committee

No one serious could have truly expected for the Super Committee to come through with a serious compromise package that could win bipartisan support.

Indeed, the entire endeavor was set up for failure from the start.  With a committee packed with liberals -- and co-chaired by the chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee -- what could possibly go wrong?!  In truth, the entire enterprise was doomed as soon as Nancy Pelosi made her appointments.
Advertisement

No doubt Democrats hoped that Republicans would "compromise" and renege on the no-taxes pledge that is a key element of their "brand" -- thereby enraging their base and all but ensuring the emergence of a competing third party that would thus guarantee Dem electoral dominance.  Fortunately, that didn't happen.

So now, the blame game begins.  Republicans should attempt to stop the disastrous cuts to defense and -- rather than being in a position where they are splintering their coalition through a debate about whether to accept a "compromise" tax increase -- let the Democrats decide whether they want to follow their leader (MIA throughout the process) in his determination to gut America's defenses.

One final note: Through such veto threats, the President may hope and believe that he will somehow gain political credit for being a "deficit hawk."  But it's worth considering that this spectacular failure of politicians and Big Government may well, at the margins, do more to hurt the image of the party (and President) who is constantly insisting that we should put our trust in Big Government -- not the party that believes in the primacy of the private sector.
Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement