Why Debbie Wasserman Schultz Is About to Start a Political Race War in...
South Carolina Senate Republicans Are Wrecking This Redistricting Push. Here Are Their Nam...
Obama-Appointed Judge Dismisses Human Smuggling Case Against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Paige Cognetti Has a History of Harming Scranton Families, and She'd Do the...
Supergirl Is Going to Be a Flop, and It's All Self-Inflicted
Here's Why the FBI Is Interviewing Milwaukee Police Officers
Vice President Vance Has a Blunt Message for Fraudsters
Zohran Mamdani Compares Himself to FDR. That's Exactly Why He's a Problem
Under Trump, the Private Sector Is Driving All New Job Creation
Navy SEAL Who Killed Osama Bin Laden Rips Into Graham Platner's Disgusting Comments...
Memorial Day Weekend Could Mark Next Chapter in U.S.-Iran Conflict
Man Accused of Michigan Shooting Was Previously Convicted of Hog-Tying Woman but Was...
Explosion at Staten Island Shipyard Injures 16
Fake IRS Agent Sentenced to 4 Years in $1.8M Fraud Scheme
Authorities Say Florida Nurse Submitted Medicaid Claims for Incarcerated, Deceased Patient...
Tipsheet

Debating the Left: Fact-Checking Tamara Holder on SCOTUS Vacancy

Debating the Left: Fact-Checking Tamara Holder on SCOTUS Vacancy

Please enjoy this Supreme Court-related segment from yesterday's Media Buzz wherein liberal panelist Tamara Holder (a) misunderstands my initial point completely,
Advertisement
(b) offers several misstatements about history and the constitution, and (c) interrupts my final answer with a question -- the response to which she was not prepared for, via Right Sightings:


In these circumstances, one must pick one's spots, so I chose not to correct Ms. Holder on her Bork comparisons, which were incorrect both regarding the year in which that confirmation battle took place (she was off by nearly two-and-a-half decades) as well as the tone of Bork's critics.  Her constitutional assertion was patently false, as evidenced by the text of the document itself.  And her decision to showcase her lack of awareness about the abundant Democratic hypocrisy on judicial appointments -- interrupting my concession that this sort of thing also occurs among Republicans -- seemed...unwise.  Had there been more time, I would have expanded upon the sitting Vice President's 
Advertisement

Related:

HYPOCRISY
extensive 'Biden Rule' comments, or the Reid/Schumer standard from the waning years of George W. Bush's presidency, or Barack Obama becoming the first president in history to demand up-or-down votes for his nominees after having attempted to deny one of his predecessors' picks the same opportunity via the filibuster.  I'll leave you with the White House chief of staff and Senate Democrats' lame duck minority leader getting grilled over the very double standards Ms. Holder evidently had never heard about -- courtesy of the Free Beacon:


And before you go, consider conservative columnist George Will's against-the-grain analysis of SCOTUS vacancy politics.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement