200 Days of War: A View From Israel's South
Hamas Publishes Proof of Life Video for American Hostage
Thanks, Biden! Here's How Iran Is Still Making Billions to Fund Terrorism
Current Thoughts on the Campaign
Barnard Caves to the Pro-Hamas Crowd
'Pathetic': DeSantis Blasts House Republicans for Giving Up Their Leverage on Top Voter...
Is the FBI Monitoring These Pro-Terrorist Student Demonstrations?
Biden Rewrote Title IX to Protect 'Trans' People. Here's How Somes States Responded.
Watch: Joe Biden's Latest Flub Is Laugh-Out-Loud Funny
Hundreds of Athletes Urge the NCAA to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
‘Net Neutrality’ Would Give Biden Wartime Powers to Censor Online Speech
Lefty Journalist Deceptively Edits Clip of Fox News Legal Expert
Is the Marist Poll a Cause for Concern?
A Swiss Air Jet Nearly Collided With Four Planes at JFK Airport
This Post on the 'Progressive' Pro-Hamas Mob Absolutely Nails It
Tipsheet

Hilarious: Giannoulias Can't Name A Single Spending Bill He Would Have Opposed

Bravo to the Chicago Tribune editorial board for pressing failed mob banker/US Senate candidate Alexi Giannoulias on a very straightforward question: If you had been in the US Senate over the last two years, which spending bills would you have voted against?  Alexi tries repeatedly to slither away from the issue, but "John" (who I believe to be board member John McCormick) just won't let him off the hook:
Advertisement




It's hard not to squirm listening to Giannoulias' "who me?" routine as he feigns confusion over whether McCormick is seeking a specific answer to a specific question.  McCormick's retort is priceless: "Specifically is how members of Congress vote, so yes."

At this point, you can practically hear Giannoulias enter panic mode.  With flop sweat beading around his temples, he fumbles desperately for a response--any response.  He finally lands on TARP--which, of course, passed under Buuusssshhh--so he assumes it's terra firma for hypothetical opposition.  Thinking he's regained his footing, Alexi assures the Trib's editors that he would have "looked at" TARP and "pushed hard" for greater accountability and oversight (and hey, why not a bailout for his family's failed back, at which he dispensed millions of dollars to known mobsters as a senior loan officer?).  McCormick, still hoping for an actual answer, asks for confirmation that Giannoulias is saying he'd have voted 'no' on TARP.  The jig is up.  Giannoulias backpeddals madly, seeming to concede that he, in fact,
Advertisement
would have joined Mark Kirk in voting 'yes' on TARP--but only if he had "no choice."

McCormick concludes the exchange by succinctly summarizing Giannoulias' decisive leadership qualities: "So we still haven't heard an answer.  There's no answer."  Gold.

Mark Kirk, despite his flaws, would have given a very clear, non-hypothetical answer to this question.  As a sitting Congressman, he did vote (specifically!) against the "stimulus" and every version of Obamacare

Rasmussen's latest poll shows Kirk ahead by four, while the Tribune poll gives Giannoulias a thin edge.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement