The headlines rightly call the medical research “outrageous and abhorrent,” a “horror” perpetrated on vulnerable people. U.S. government experiments in the 1940s (run by the National Institutes of Health) intentionally and secretly infected Guatemalan prisoners, soldiers and the mentally ill with syphilis. It was a wrong-headed attempt to advance medical knowledge for the benefit of many but at great cost to a few.
The researchers’ purpose, in theory, was good: to test the effectiveness of a then-new drug, penicillin. So much vital information was at stake, for the good of so many.
Even more compelling, the pain and human suffering these experiments sought to alleviate was real—and devastating. Left untreated, syphilis causes vision and hearing loss, paralysis, mental disorders and even death, according to WebMD.
So, why experiment on Guatemalan “patients?” Because they were far removed from American consciousness and laws. They were voiceless, vulnerable, and unprotected.
Kind of like human embryos are now.
The phrase “embryonic stem cell research” puts a scientist’s gloss on what really happens: our smallest humans, embryos, become subjects for experimentation. And when they’ve served their purpose, they’re done for. Living beings, now dead.
The rationale for embryonic stem cell research follows the same pattern present in the Guatemalan “horrors.”
The purpose is good, at least on the surface: take stem cells and find out how to make medical miracles happen. So much vital information is at stake, for the good of so many.
And, as it was for syphilis, the pain and human suffering the research hopes to alleviate is real—and devastating. The hope poignant. But destroying embryos can’t be the answer.
Like the Guatemalan patients of the 1940s, embryos are voiceless, vulnerable, and unprotected. They live, “suspended” in storage, out of sight, too young to make the case for their own dignity and right to life. And the laws—well, the Obama administration has pushed relentlessly to undo the Bush administration prohibitions on embryonic stem cell research.
Medical “progress,” for the benefit of many but at great cost to a few, must go on.
Walters on the Pope's "Controversial" Comments: The Church is Returning to its Roots | Cortney O'Brien
Bobby Jindal Backs Phil Robertson: I Remember When TV networks believed in the First Amendment | Katie Pavlich