Mona Charen

"Sickly. Weak. Feeble. Pick your choice." So began a Washington Post story about John McCain's presidential campaign almost exactly a year ago. "The one-time front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination has disappointing poll numbers and deathly results from the second quarter of fundraising. His failed effort to push through a comprehensive immigration bill has alienated him from many conservative Republican voters. ... Out of luck and money, he's a man looking for love."

Well, well. The newest polling has him in a virtual tie with Barack Obama (some ahead, some a little behind). He may not have found love, but he has certainly found luck.

Luck has been sitting on John McCain's shoulder for 12 months and seems to be warming to her task as November approaches. Consider:

1) If immigration had remained a sizzling issue throughout the Republican primaries, McCain would never have revived. But it didn't. The topic that dominated the summer of 2007 and had talk radio in a perpetual froth collapsed like a cheap tent. People continue to care about the issue, but the white-hot coals have cooled, and other matters have eclipsed it.

2) If Huckabee had not wounded Romney in Iowa, sending Romney limping into New Hampshire, McCain would probably have lost to Romney in the first two contests of 2008. It is hard to imagine that if Romney had won Iowa and New Hampshire (as his playbook called for) that he would not have won the remainder of the major races and taken the nomination.

3) Iraq was going to choke the air out of McCain's campaign. Though he was a persistent and public critic of the Bush Administration's handling of the war (he called Donald Rumsfeld "one of the worst secretaries of defense in U.S. history"), McCain was closely associated in the public mind with the war in general, which he firmly supported. If chaos and failure in Iraq had continued to dominate the headlines into 2008, McCain's votes would have been measurable with an eyedropper. But instead, and enormously to the credit of John McCain, President Bush changed his war strategy. McCain had long argued that the war was incompetently prosecuted and complained that more troops were required. When Bush at long last embraced the McCain critique and changed generals and strategies in Iraq, fortune again smiled upon McCain by delivering a rapid success. The gains in Iraq are still fragile, as Gen. David Petraeus has warned, but this, too, works to McCain's advantage. Voters will be asked to choose between a man who foresaw the correct strategy and can guide events toward a satisfactory conclusion, and a man who even today declines to acknowledge that opposing the surge (Obama had argued that it would make things worse!) was a mistake.

Mona Charen

Mona Charen is a syndicated columnist, political analyst and author of Do-Gooders: How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help .
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Mona Charen's column. Sign up today and receive daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
©Creators Syndicate