Chapman deserves respect because he has been a professor since Kevin Casimer was still wetting his pants – that is assuming Kevin Casimer does not still wet his pants when he is exposed to a contrary opinion. Chapman has also written three books. But he is a self-described conservative Christian and thus not seen as worthy of respect by the self- appointed members of the university Gaystapo.
In his October post, "An Economic Case against Homosexuality," Chapman said something I have been saying for years: that money spent on AIDS research would be better spent on cancer and heart research. He has also echoed my concern that the health care debate has not sufficiently addressed the economic costs of homosexual behavior.
Since Chapman does not teach any classes his views could hardly be likely to offend students who are not going out of their way to be offended. Certainly, no one is arguing that he has ever failed to provide reference and research assistance to someone on the basis of sexuality. Had that happened in his 15 years as a professor then the discriminatory conduct could have been addressed directly without interfering with his private free speech rights. But there has been no such misconduct. No one has been injured including those pretending to be offended.
Kevin Casimer lies publicly when he says he and others are not attacking Chapman's right to say what he wants to say. He has already stated that Chapman's views and presence may dissuade students and others from wanting to associate with Purdue. And he has sought to have Chapman removed on the theory that he might discriminate.