That is perhaps why so many pundits agree that despite Mitt Romney’s strong performance in Denver, President Obama need only mention the “war on women” in one of the remaining debates to bring him to his knees. Even though pro-life self-identification is more prevalent than the President’s position of taxpayer-funded abortion on-demand, the fact that Republicans are the ones painted as “waging war” shows this may be a real concern.
It need not be. According to Gallup, the majority of Americans agree with Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan and take the “pro-life” position. We need only clearly articulate it and dispel the Obama campaign’s willful untruths.
For example, pro-life Americans support women’s health and the rights of women, and men, to plan their families.
The difference between Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan and the majority of Americans that identify themselves as “pro-life” on one side, and President Obama on the other, is that we believe abortion is wrong. Governor Romney has said he supports the reversal of Roe v. Wade. States should have the right to enact commonsense limits on a procedure that ends one life and wounds another.
Pro-life Americans are also pro-religious freedom – in the way our founders intended it and past presidents have upheld it. President Obama has launched a needless and reckless fight with religious schools, charities, hospitals and businesses, forcing them to provide sterilizations and abortion drugs that violate their moral convictions. That’s just wrong. A majority disagree with President Obama on this issue. We want an end to this abuse of conscience.
Furthermore, an overwhelming majority (72 percent) of Americans oppose taxpayer funding for abortion. That’s why the pro-life movement cheered when Governor Romney committed to asking Congress to end funding of agencies that promote and provide abortion. This is not a new issue. Forty years ago, when Congress approved the first family planning grants, it said these funds could not be used in a program where abortion is a means of family planning. They wanted a bright line, a bipartisan bright line between abortion and family planning.
Losing Jobs Over Ex-Im’s Expiration? Don’t Believe ItLosing Jobs Over Ex-Im’s Expiration? Don’t Believe It | Ed Feulner