The global warmists -- mostly drawn from the left -- may or may not be right about global warming. As they say in their recent Climate Assessment, "Climate change, once considered an issue for the distant future, has moved firmly into the present." Well, maybe so, but there is still little we can do to alleviate global warming. America is, mostly for economic reasons, meeting the goals of the Kyoto Protocol without actually having signed the treaty. In fact, we were the first major industrialized nation to do so, back in 2012. The problem of global warming resides not with us but with other nations. Led by China, the poorer countries of the world are paying no attention to the Kyoto nonsense, and one should not expect them to. Why should a poor country impede its growing standard of living for the grandiose and highly speculative goal of climate control?
Globalization seems to have set off a widespread economic boom in some of the earth's impoverished regions. If the boom is to continue, those economically emerging countries will be in need of more energy, more fossil fuel. They cannot put their trust in the flimsy promises of solar or wind power.
I wonder if the world's leftist elites operating out of such haunts as the United Nations ever recognized the growing energy needs of emerging nations. Did they just think that the world's poor nations would always be with us? Did they not think that the benefits of commerce, generally free markets, would reach China, India and elsewhere? What is needed is for the richer countries of the world to invest in technologies that will mitigate global warming, and that will come when it is economically viable. What is needed is the development of technologies to capture carbon dioxide and other elements that contribute to global warming. Such technologies do not exist today but they might exist in the future if development continues.
"Soldier's Christmas": How a Rock Band Is Raising Awareness For Military Families This Season | Kevin Glass