When It Comes to Abortion, the Left Is Terrified of Women Actually Having...
Today’s Deep Political Division Is Caused by Differing Goals
The Times May Be a-Changin’
Cities Won’t Solve the Housing Crisis by Blaming Software
Trump’s Anthropic Action Proves International AI Moratorium Is Possible
Punish Success and Capital Will Leave
Does the Rest of the World Care More About America Than… Americans?
The Next Frontier of American Independence Is in the Medicine Cabinet
From Lionel Messi to Hyenas in Ethiopia: It’s Always ‘the Jews’
The Border Is Not American Soil Until You Cross It
Republicans Are Laying Down One of Their Best Legal Weapons
Biden Fueled China's Chip Boom, but Trump Can Restore America's Lead
Weak and Pathetic: How School Administrators Put Politics Before Parents
Democrats Ask: Obama Who?
They Fought for This Country. They Shouldn't Have to Leave It to Heal.
Tipsheet

Trump's Attorneys Find Holes in Witnesses' 'Catch-and-Kill' Testimony

Trump's Attorneys Find Holes in Witnesses' 'Catch-and-Kill' Testimony
AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura, Pool

Defense attorneys for former President Donald Trump found inconsistencies in the ongoing case of his hush money trial on Friday regarding charges stemming from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. 

Advertisement

Trump attorney Emil Bove grilled David Pecker— the former CEO of tabloid publisher American Media, Inc.— regarding his history of burying disadvantaging stories about high-profile public people.

Pecker was asked about an FBI interview he gave in April 2018, in which he described the process as being known as a “catch-and-kill.” He said this involved buying rights to stories about public figures and never publishing them. 

However, he appeared to change his testimony about the process. Pecker claimed that he first learned about “catch-and-kill” from federal prosecutors rather than it being a term used with publishing stories about Trump. 

During a meeting between Pecker and Trump on Jan. 6, 2017, “Trump did not express any gratitude to Pecker and AMI” for killing a story about Trump, according to the FBI’s notes from the following year, Bove observed

The defense attorney then pointed out how Pecker testified from the witness stand one day earlier with an entirely different account. Pecker had said Thursday that Trump did in fact thank him at the meeting because AMI-owned National Enquirer reached a $30,000 deal with a doorman during Trump’s presidential run that prevented the doorman from going public with an unproven allegation that Trump fathered a child out of wedlock. Via the Washington Examiner. 

Advertisement

Related:

TRUMP

Trump’s legal team argued that Pecker may not be a credible witness in the case. They also questioned the financial motives behind AMI's decision to buy the rights to Karen McDougal's story about her alleged affair with Trump. Bove argued that Pecker’s decision benefited AMI and not what was best for Trump’s presidential campaign at the time. 

Bove accused Pecker of lying under oath, pointing out that his testimony had changed from the day before.

“I know what I testified to yesterday, and I know what I remember,” Pecker said. 

“Are you suggesting the FBI made a mistake here?” Bove responded. 

“I know what the truth is. I can’t state why this is written this way. I know what was said to me,” Pecker said. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement