Can You Feel the Vibe Shift?
A YouTuber Did What No Other News Outlet Would Regarding These Somalian Fraud...
A Guest Thought She Could Slide This Gibe at the GOP on CNN....
This CBS News Reporter DID NOT Drink the Kool-Aid Regarding This Story About...
Of Course, the Trump White House Issuing This Statement Triggered a Meltdown in...
Democrats Hate Police, Love Postal Workers?
SNAP Waivers Mean These States Will Ban Junk Food Purchases Starting in 2026
Three Illegal Immigrants Were Just Arrested for a Massive Gift Card Fraud Scheme
Let's Be Honest
Reflection on Year’s End: Infighting at TPUSA?
Trump's Yearly Performance Review
It's Morning Again in America
Frightening CCP Infiltration of the U.S. at All-Time High
Here's What Happened at Trump's Russia-Ukraine Peace Deal Presser
Justice Department Reaches Proposed Settlement With Blackstone-Owned LivCor in Rent-Price...
Tipsheet

Trump's Attorneys Find Holes in Witnesses' 'Catch-and-Kill' Testimony

AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura, Pool

Defense attorneys for former President Donald Trump found inconsistencies in the ongoing case of his hush money trial on Friday regarding charges stemming from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. 

Advertisement

Trump attorney Emil Bove grilled David Pecker— the former CEO of tabloid publisher American Media, Inc.— regarding his history of burying disadvantaging stories about high-profile public people.

Pecker was asked about an FBI interview he gave in April 2018, in which he described the process as being known as a “catch-and-kill.” He said this involved buying rights to stories about public figures and never publishing them. 

However, he appeared to change his testimony about the process. Pecker claimed that he first learned about “catch-and-kill” from federal prosecutors rather than it being a term used with publishing stories about Trump. 

During a meeting between Pecker and Trump on Jan. 6, 2017, “Trump did not express any gratitude to Pecker and AMI” for killing a story about Trump, according to the FBI’s notes from the following year, Bove observed

The defense attorney then pointed out how Pecker testified from the witness stand one day earlier with an entirely different account. Pecker had said Thursday that Trump did in fact thank him at the meeting because AMI-owned National Enquirer reached a $30,000 deal with a doorman during Trump’s presidential run that prevented the doorman from going public with an unproven allegation that Trump fathered a child out of wedlock. Via the Washington Examiner. 

Advertisement

Related:

TRUMP

Trump’s legal team argued that Pecker may not be a credible witness in the case. They also questioned the financial motives behind AMI's decision to buy the rights to Karen McDougal's story about her alleged affair with Trump. Bove argued that Pecker’s decision benefited AMI and not what was best for Trump’s presidential campaign at the time. 

Bove accused Pecker of lying under oath, pointing out that his testimony had changed from the day before.

“I know what I testified to yesterday, and I know what I remember,” Pecker said. 

“Are you suggesting the FBI made a mistake here?” Bove responded. 

“I know what the truth is. I can’t state why this is written this way. I know what was said to me,” Pecker said. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement