Kamala Harris Isn’t a Genuine Gun Owner
JD Vance Delivered Another Masterclass in Obliterating the Media
Will We Be Allowed to Win?
Anyone Notice What Was Odd About the First Biden Cabinet Meeting in 11...
The Press Appears Unbothered Joe Biden Is Not in Charge, and Journalist Scandals...
Harris to Give Abortion Speech Blaming Trump for Two Deaths He Had Nothing...
Ramaswamy Just Blew the Lid Off Left-Wing Media's Cover-Up of Springfield, Ohio
Nancy Mace Exposes CNN Guest With Damaging Screenshots
Chicago Schools Tell Teachers to Pass Migrant Students Regardless of Performance
Scott Jennings Comes Armed With Hard Truths on Antisemitism From the Left
Here's How Many American Voters Support Taylor Swift After Her Kamala Harris Endorsement
YIKES: Was This Kamala's Most Awkward Moment Yet?
Acting Secret Service Director Gives Update Regarding First Trump Assassination Attempt
Post-Debate Poll Shares Telling Details About That 'Bounce' for Kamala Harris
California City Sues the State Over Law Attacking Parents' Rights
OPINION

The Anti-White Infrastructure Bill

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Joerg Carstensen/dpa via AP

The infrastructure bill the Senate passed on Tuesday discriminates against whites at every turn.

Americans are enthusiastic about spending money on infrastructure — bridges, roads, broadband and green technologies. But this racist bill locates and hands out jobs and contracts projects based on race, not merit. Minority businesses and neighborhoods hold the inside track. If you're white, you're low priority.

Advertisement

The bill includes grants to install solar or wind technologies and generate jobs in areas decimated by closing coal mines or coal-fired electric plans. Here's the catch: when contractors bid, the bill says minority-owned businesses will get chosen first. Bad news for white contractors and displaced coal miners, who are overwhelmingly white and need jobs. (Section 40209)

The same is true for the bill's proposals to improve traffic patterns in cities. Contractors and subcontractors get priority only if they're owned by minorities or women. White male business owners can take a hike. (Section 11509)

Americans should be outraged. But not surprised. After all, President Joe Biden's American Rescue Plan Act, which passed in March, also put into place an ugly system of discrimination against whites. It offered debt relief to black farmers but not white farmers. Another provision offered billions in aid to minority-owned and women-owned restaurants, but it told struggling restaurants owners who happened to be white men that they had to go to the back of the line.

The injustice was obvious. White male farmers and restaurant owners sued, claiming the anti-white provisions are unconstitutional. So far, they're winning. In every case, federal judges have halted the race-based programs in the American Rescue Plan Act until the challengers have their day in court. Politico reported last week that Biden's Justice Department may fold without a fight on the black farmer debt relief cases because the law is not on their side.

Advertisement

You'd think Democrats and the Biden White House would get the message. Instead, they're doubling down on rigging legislation and divvying up taxpayer dollars to benefit minorities and shortchange whites.

Chances are high that the infrastructure bill's hodgepodge of anti-white discrimination will be struck down by federal courts. In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution bars the government from trying to even the score by discriminating against whites and in favor of minorities. The justices warned against creating "a patchwork of racial preferences based on statistical generalizations" to correct past injustices. That's precisely what this infrastructure bill does.

The bill's backers would have you believe that obsolete airports, dilapidated public works and deteriorating roads and public spaces are evidence of racial injustice. Rep. Yvette Clarke rails that "our infrastructure is racist" and calls on the Congress to pass a bill that "puts the needs of underserved and disadvantaged communities at the fore."

That's code for minority communities. But the truth is there are plenty of poor white people in this country, too, and poor, predominantly white communities could benefit from a bold, federal infrastructure initiative. Race and ethnicity should have nothing to do with it. Locate the projects and put the funds where the the economic need is greatest, regardless of race.

Advertisement

West Virginia has the lowest average income in the nation and ranks 46th in Internet connectivity. Maine ranks 36th out of 50 states for income and 34th in broadband connectivity. People in these states could really benefit from federal broadband assistance. Here's the hitch: The infrastructure bill tilts the scale in favor of states with high minority and non-English speaking populations instead of considering economic need and existing broadband capacity (Sections 60304 and 60305). But because Maine and West Virginia are 94% white, they'll get less.

Polls show that Americans favor fixing roads, bridges, tunnels and airports. They know that good infrastructure promotes economic growth. What they've been kept in the dark about the fine print in Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's bill. Under the guise of upgrading the nation, the bill unfairly favors black and brown Americans and treats whites like second class citizens.

Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York and author of "The Next Pandemic," available at Amazon.com. Contact her at betsy@betsymccaughey.com or on Twitter @Betsy_McCaughey. To find out more about Betsy McCaughey and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos