Whether delivered as a rock, rifle round or laser burst, lethal fire by a military force is one of the two most fundamental combat actions. It is certainly the action best understood by artists. From cave painters to Hollywood directors, their material weapons make the "fire" threat posed by the spearman and the sniper explicit.
The second combat fundamental, maneuver, is a bit harder to depict as the combat threat it is. Boots or tank treads can visually indicate two means of maneuver (by foot, by vehicle) but neither has quite the visual impact of the soldier's rifle or the tank's main gun.
Maneuver, however, is fire's dynamic battle buddy. Throw the rock, and run; odds are Homo erectus understood the combination's logic. Shoot and scoot was the U.S. Army Armor School's clever formulation in 1974. The slow and agonizing struggle known as the Cold War was very real in 1974. One tank gunnery instructor joked that those of us headed for armor units in West Germany (remember West Germany?) might have to master the trick of shooting while scooting backward. When the Soviet tanks (remember the Soviets?) cross the intra-German border, just keep her in reverse all the way back to the Rhine, Lieutenant.
Military maneuver, whether tactical (my tank's predicted retreat), operational (what the Russians have pulled off in Crimea) or strategic (e.g., moving five divisions to Kuwait by sea and air), is about more than running and scooting. Maneuver has an objective: to secure a position of comparative advantage over an enemy.
The Russians have certainly done that in Crimea. They have seized several advantageous positions without bloodshed. Adolf Hitler did the same when his forces re-militarized the Rhineland on March 7, 1936. That maneuver violated the 1919 Treaty of Versailles. The French thought Versailles ended World War I. Hitler disagreed; he didn't think the war was over. "Re-militarization" created a new strategic fact on the ground: German forces in the Rhineland. It also created a new political fact: Hitler paid no significant international political price for breaking the treaty. In historical retrospect, "re-militarization" was a euphemism for invasion.
At the moment, the Pentagon prefers to call the aggressive employment of "fire and maneuver" against an adversary "kinetic military action" or sometimes simply "kinetics." Kinetics is a euphemism for war. Adversary is a euphemism for enemy. Several European Union political leaders and the Obama Administration have called Czar-Commissar Vladimir Putin's decision to send Russian troops into the Crimean Peninsula a "terrible mistake" or grave error. Both strike me as euphemisms for terrible invasion.
Austin Bay is the author of three novels. His third novel, The Wrong Side of Brightness, was published by Putnam/Jove in June 2003. He has also co-authored four non-fiction books, to include A Quick and Dirty Guide to War: Third Edition (with James Dunnigan, Morrow, 1996).
Be the first to read Austin Bay's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Bernie Sanders and Robert Reich Are Confused by Economics. And Government. And Reality | Seton Motley