Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Terry Jeffrey :: Townhall.com Columnist
Should Government Have E-Record of Every Woman Who's Had an Abortion?
by Terry Jeffrey
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

Should doctors and hospitals be required by the federal government to maintain a national network of electronic health records for every individual in America that indicates, for example, whether that individual has had an abortion, a sexually transmitted disease, a mental illness or a drug problem?

Such a system has already been mandated by the stimulus law enacted in February, and politicians in Washington, D.C., would now prefer not to answer straightforward questions about it.

Americans should not let them get away with it.

The stimulus law provided for "the development of a nationwide health information technology infrastructure" that would include an electronic health record for "each person in the United States by 2014."

Arguing with Idiots By Glenn Beck

The law says these records should contain each person's "medical history and problems lists."

This system holding each American's "medical history and problems lists," the law says, will allow for "the electronic linkage of health care providers, health plans, the government and other interested parties to enable electronic exchange and use of health information among all the components in the health care infrastructure in accordance with applicable law."

When President Obama was pushing his health care plan earlier this year, he pointed to this system as a way the government would save money on health care -- and indicated that a person's full medical history would be included in the system.

"You shouldn't have to tell every new doctor you see about your medical history, or what prescriptions you're taking. You should not have to repeat costly tests," Obama told the American Medical Association on June 15. "All that information should be stored securely in a private medical record so that your information can be tracked from one doctor to another -- even if you change jobs, even if you move, even if you have to see a number of different specialists. That's just common sense. And that will not only mean less paper-pushing and lower administrative costs, saving taxpayers billions of dollars; it will also mean all of you physicians will have an easier time doing your jobs."

At a town hall meeting in Annandale, Va., on July 1, Obama argued that the electronic-health-records system would also reduce medical errors.

"We have to build on the investments that we've made in electronic medical records," said Obama. "We already made those investments in the Recovery Act -- because when everything is digitalized, all your records -- your privacy is protected, but all your records (are) on a digital form -- that reduces medical errors."

Speaking at AARP headquarters on July 28, Obama said the electronic-health-records network would substitute for people having to "relay their entire medical history" to each new health care provider. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSNews

Be the first to read Terence Jeffrey's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Hmmm...
At first you think, yeah, I can see the benefits of this, but then just a little pondering becomes...hmmmmm...
This article got me thinking:

HOW FAR BACK are records even available? Like, if someone had an abortion back in 1973 under a different name than they now use, would that make it's way to today's electronic records? I haven't been to the doctor in literal years; how long do doctors KEEP records? How long have we been utilizing Social Security numbers in relation to medical records? What about identity theft? - it's supposed to be so prevalent now, your records could include somebody else's...

I tried to obtain dental records once when moving and they couldn't find any - apparently lost! (Better hope I never get murdered where forensics can't identify me without those, I thought.)

Credit bureaus started off being benign and useful, but now you have to monitor them and sometimes struggle painfully to get corrections made, etc, and they hold too much power over our lives now.

Oh for the good ole days when local reputation was sufficient for most things... Government is too corrupt, unaccountable and Orwellian now! Where's the ACLU and defense of privacy when we really need it?

Not against electronic records
BTW, I'm not against electronic records. I like the whole idea of a smart-card that I can take with me to providers so that they can have the information I choose to give them. I'm against electronic records posted to a public website because I KNOW FROM EXPERIENCE that it's easy to tap into them and now everybody's information is out there for everybody to read.

Not having been sick a lot, I don't really care if MY information gets out there. Try not to snore through my two sinus infections and the three fillings I've had in my adult life. Oh, and I've had two babies by midwive delibery. Exciting, huh? However, my friend whose ex-husband gave her Hep-B might object to her boss knowing that or another friend might not want all the details of his alcohol rehab 20 years ago just available for the church deacon committee to peruse. Then I think of clients at my work place who have had PTSD or depression and how they might not want everybody in the world knowing those details either. Then there's the REALLY SCARY PART where if you have my log-in to AKAims, you can go in and change diagnoses and other fun activities.

Yeah, we want hackers to have that ability, don't we?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.