Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, January 20, 2008
Steve Chapman :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Growing Aversion to Abortion
by Steve Chapman
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


The abortion debate has raged since 1973, when the Supreme Court gave abortion constitutional protection, but the basic law of the land has proved immutable. Abortion is legal, and it's going to remain legal for a long time.

Laws often alter attitudes, inducing people to accept things -- such as racial integration -- they once rejected. But sometimes, attitudes move in the opposite direction, as people see the consequences of the change. That's the case with abortion.

The news that the abortion rate has fallen to its lowest level in 30 years elicits various explanations, from increased use of contraceptives to lack of access to abortion clinics. But maybe the chief reason is that the great majority of Americans, even many who see themselves as pro-choice, are deeply uncomfortable with it.

In 1992, a Gallup/Newsweek poll found 34 percent of Americans thought abortion "should be legal under any circumstances," with 13 percent saying it should always be illegal. Last year, only 26 percent said it should always be allowed, with 18 percent saying it should never be permitted.

Sentiments are even more negative among the group that might place the highest value on being able to escape an unwanted pregnancy: young people. In 2003, Gallup found, one of every three kids from age 13 to 17 said abortion should be illegal in all circumstances. More revealing yet is that 72 percent said abortion is "morally wrong."

By now, pro-life groups know that outlawing most abortions is not a plausible aspiration. So they have adopted a two-pronged strategy. The first is to regulate it more closely -- with parental notification laws, informed consent requirements and a ban on partial-birth abortion. The second is to educate Americans with an eye toward changing "hearts and minds." In both, they have had considerable success.

Even those who insist Americans are solidly in favor of legal abortion implicitly acknowledge the widespread distaste. That's why the Democratic Party's 2004 platform omitted any mention of the issue, and why politicians who support abortion rights cloak them in euphemisms like "the right to choose."

But some abortion rights supporters admit reservations. It was a landmark moment in 1995 when the pro-choice author Naomi Wolf, writing in The New Republic magazine, declared that "the death of a fetus is a real death." She went on: "By refusing to look at abortion within a moral framework, we lose the millions of Americans who want to support abortion as a legal right but still need to condemn it as a moral iniquity."

The report on abortion rates from the Guttmacher Institute suggests that the evolution of attitudes has transformed behavior. Since 1990, the number of abortions has dropped from 1.61 million to 1.21 million. The abortion rate among women of childbearing age has declined by 29 percent. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Steve Chapman is a columnist and editorial writer for the Chicago Tribune.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Thanks
Jayne,

I appreciate you offering your thoughts. You come across brainy enough for me.

I understand that those believing a soul arises in an embryo at conception will go at these issues differently than I have suggested above. I suppose that may be behind some of the "it's simple" comments as well.

All,

I appreciate your thoughts and indulgence as well.

My questions were not idle. While I have a sense that the Supreme Court came close to the mark as a matter of ethics as well as law in its effort to balance disparate interests in Roe v. Wade, I haven't entirely puzzled out exactly where and how I would draw the line and why.

The well-intentioned admonitions about valuing and loving human life resonate with me--when I contemplate a fully formed and functioning person (in the sense of someone who has been born) and even a fetus "far enough along" in its development. I don't experience such loving and valuing, though, when I contemplate an embryo. Determining how far is "far enough along" has been at least one aim of my inquiries.

Perhaps you can understand then that, given that paradigm, when the life and interests of a woman come into conflict with the life and interests (so to speak) of an embryo, it strikes me as odd, indeed unethical, to sacrifice a woman in favor of an embryo.

Doug Indeap
Though you might disagree, many pro-lifers would say that at the moment of conception a human soul is created. For the Christian, this is what makes us human.

To end this life, even in the earliest stages--is the same as ending the life of an 8 year-old child, or a 35 year-old adult--even though the person is in a vastly different stage of development.

Now if many of us also agree that God asks us to love our neighbor as we love ourself (it is the golden rule); we simply can't end that life. For myself, it would be murder--which is not loving my neighbor.

One more point: I believe we are called to be good stewards to the creation and earth God has given us. This means we don't treat His creation cruelly.

Even if one doesn't believe that an unborn baby is human or has a soul, it is a being apart from the mother (even though the baby is dependent on her for life--which is also the case after he/she is born, just not as extreme).

This unborn baby develops nerve endings in the womb and can feel pain. To tear it apart, or puncture the skull for extraction, or burn it alive from saline is horribly cruel (read Gianna Jensen's story; she is a survivor from such a procedure), especially since these procedures do not administer pain killers.

Also, in some cases the baby survives and is born. The baby (for me), will placed in a room and left to die--sometimes this takes hours. To me this is unspeakably cruel--even for a mouse, a cat, or your ET.

Many of us are compelled to stand up against abortion for these reasons; the same way we are a compelled to report child abuse (even by law!).

I don't expect you to agree. But this is why I, and anyone who follows the Catholic faith believes this way (read Pope John Paul II's encyclicals for more in-depth theology). It's simply our moral code.

I don't think I can hang with you guys on anything deeper. I'm not brainy enough (I'm not being sarcastic). :)

My over-simplified answer would just be: Love.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.