Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, August 11, 2008
Mike Adams :: Townhall.com Columnist
Unholy Toledo
by Mike Adams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

Mike, below is the statement that Larry Burns Lawrence.Burns2@utoledo.edu referred to earlier. Please let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks, Matt Matt.Lockwood@utoledo.edu

“The University of Toledo is a value-driven institution. UT’s values are clearly stated in our strategic plan and elsewhere. One of our primary values is inclusiveness. This means UT’s doors are open to every student, employee, patient and the community.

“The University welcomes respectful dissent and input from others on all issues with the understanding that free speech and debate make our institution stronger. However, people holding certain jobs within a public institution have special responsibilities concerning the utterances they are allowed to convey.

“The requirements of the job previously held by Crystal Dixon required her to lead a critical function regarding personnel actions for the University. Given UT’s values, Ms. Dixon’s stated views drew into question her ability to be inclusive and caused the University to conclude that she is unable to continue to function in her role as associate vice president for human resources.”

Matt, thank you. I have two questions regarding the following statement: "Ms. Dixon’s stated views drew into question her ability to be inclusive and caused the University to conclude that she is unable to continue to function in her role as associate vice president for human resources."
 
1. Are you saying that you excluded Mrs. Dixon because she was not inclusive?
 
2. Did Mrs. Dixon ever fire someone because she was intolerant of their views?
 
Mike Adams adams_mike@hotmail.com

Mike, we are not going to comment beyond the statement…Matt

Matt, I think it would be in the university's best interests to comment further. You           asked me to "let (you) know if (I) need anything else." I need some help understanding your statement because it seems somewhat contradictory. I am asking you legitimate questions. I hope you will consider my (narrowed) request that you answer just one question. It follows:
 
1. Does the University of Toledo have a zero tolerance policy regarding intolerance?

This is an important and legitimate question that you should answer. The choice to ignore it is more than just disrespectful towards me. It is also disrespectful towards The University of Toledo. I cannot imagine how a university unable to answer such a direct question could continue to call itself an institution of higher learning.
 
Please understand this to be a respectful and serious inquiry.

Mike Adams 

Matt, I am disappointed by your non-response. Let's try to do this one paragraph at a time. This should be easy to do, given that there are only about a half-dozen paragraphs contained in Ms. Dixon's guest column. Paragraph one is reprinted in its entirety here below:

 "I read with great interest Michael Miller's April 6 column, "Gay Rights and Wrongs." I respectfully submit a different perspective for Miller and Toledo Free Press readers to consider. First, human beings, regardless of their choices in life, are of ultimate value to God and should be viewed the same by others. At the same time, one's personal choices lead to outcomes either positive or negative."

My questions about this paragraph follow:

 1. Did you draw the same conclusion I did; namely that this was an effort by your former employee to expand the marketplace of ideas - in other words, to promote diversity?

2. Do you disagree with Mrs. Dixon's implication that homosexuals "are of ultimate value to God." Just in case you were wondering, I agree with Dixon. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Mike Adams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
SkorpioG homosexuals can go straight

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010509/apon line013921_000.htm

http://www.voanews.com/english/AmericanLife/2007-03-12-voa5 7.cfm

http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/narth/wsjletter01.html

http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/narth/survey.html

http://www.leaderu.com/stonewall/pages/jeff_k.html

http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/narth/bulletin01/07.html

http://www.leaderu.com/stonewall/issues/change.html

http://blog.catholic-convert.com/?p=1501

http://erlc.com/article/ex-homosexual-overcame-helping-othe rs

http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/11/72005e.asp

The point is that if the one in Mike's article and these mentioned above can willfully change their sexual orientation then homosexuality is a choice that can be turned from. These listings demonstrate that you have been lied to. I can find others if you want.

To Birdman
You are confusing an act with nature. Murder does not equate to homosexual. Homosexual is a state of being, where the opposite is heterosexual. You are heterosexual and you have heterosexual acts. By your absolutist reasoning, if someone experiments with or has sex with another of the same gender, even once, they forever are a homosexual. This is extremely narrow thinking and prevents you from considering things beyond that narrow definition. You apparently only know what you know, and when others try to give you more information, you reject it.

Sexuality is based on how you feel and what you consider normal. However, you claim that I can wake up tomorrow and not be gay, because you consider it an act and not a state of being. Then by that logic, you can wake up tomorrow and become gay. To prove this theory, I would like you to do just that. Tomorrow, I challenge you to be gay and go out and test your theory.

Please report back. I will listen to everything you have to say from then onward. If you don't find this to be patently absurd, then stop and say so.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.