Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Matt Kibbe :: Townhall.com Columnist
On Capitol Hill, A Fight for the Soul of the Republican Party
by Matt Kibbe
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


Early next week, Republicans in Congress face a decision that will say much about the party’s future direction on spending discipline.

Rep. Roger Wicker is going to the Senate to replace retiring Sen. Trent Lott, leaving a rare open seat on the powerful House Appropriations Committee.

The Appropriations Committee controls the spending levers for most of the federal government. And too often, both parties abuse that power to insert “earmarks” that divert your tax dollars to special interest projects. In recent years, these earmarks have included millions to build a rainforest in Iowa and the famous “bridge to nowhere” in Alaska.

In 2006, the American people showed that, when given a choice between Democrats and Republicans who act like Democrats, they will pick the Democrats. The Republican Party needs to return to its fiscally responsible roots in order to regain public trust on this key issue. Sometimes, you need to shake up business-as-usual in order to make real change.

That’s where Congressman Jeff Flake comes into the picture. Rep. Flake, a Republican from Arizona, is a close ally of fiscal conservatives who has made a name for himself on Capitol Hill for his stalwart stand against the practice of earmarking. He consistently puts the spotlight on pork spending in his weekly “Egregious Earmark” press releases and in frequent speeches on the House floor. Last year, he offered dozens of floor amendments to strike funding for some of the most abusive earmarks.

Jeff Flake is serious about reining in spending and has done a heroic job fighting waste. But he can do even more by attacking the issue at its choke-point from inside the Appropriations Committee.

The earmarks process is deliberately complicated and difficult to monitor. Members of Congress who are not on the Appropriations Committee have little time to even review them. For example, the “omnibus” appropriations bill passed last month contained more than 8,000 earmarks spread over 3,417 pages, and most Members of Congress had only 22 hours to read it before the vote.

Appointing Jeff Flake to Appropriations would give taxpayers a seat at the spending table and provide an early warning system against abusive earmarks. The committee spot will provide Rep. Flake’s team with critical new staff resources and early access to the text of spending bills. Simply having him on the committee would provide a major deterrent effect against some of the worst abuses. After all, as we saw in vote after vote last year, it is very tough to kill earmarks once they are placed in a bill. Most important, perhaps, is that Rep. Flake’s appointment would make a major statement to the American people that the Republican Party is returning to first principles, such as bringing transparency and accountability to Congressional spending. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Matt Kibbe is the president of FreedomWorks.

Be the first to read Matt Kibbe's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Ron Paul is libertarian,not conservative
Ron Paul is a libertarian, not a conservative, which is why he has not chance of winning the Republican nomination. Even though Republicans take a nearly libertarian position on some issues, we are not libertarians.

It's also important that libertarians have been around for a long, long time, and they always lose. I can remember libertarians complaining about some of President Reagan's actions in the early 80's.

Earmarking is meaningless
Earmarking is meaningless, because so little money is spent on bridges to nowhere. The real money is in popular entitlements like social security and medicare.

If earmarks are eliminated, the money will still be spent on bridges to nowhere. It will just be allocated at the state level, after the Congress passes the same amount of money out as a block grant.

But I do support getting rid of earmarks because it is a highly visible cosmetic issue. We can take care of this, then move on to something serious.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.