Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, June 03, 2009
Hugh Hewitt :: Townhall.com Columnist
Stopping Government Motors
by Hugh Hewitt
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



President Obama's decision to seize General Motors and convert it into Government Motors is as shocking as it is unpopular. Polling shows, like the president's stubborn insistence that Gitmo be closed and its terrorist prisoners brought stateside, the president's insistence that GM be nationalized is appalling to large majorities of Americans. The socialization of America's biggest brand is not the sort of decision that can be cloaked in head-faking rhetoric. What had been a private company on the verge of bankruptcy is now a government actor competing against private sector companies and using the federal treasury as an enormous unfair advantage in the marketplace. Even if the cost itself was not so staggering, the idea of the federal government declaring itself on the side of one of many competitors is as distasteful as it is unprecedented. It must be reversed.

*** Special Offer ***

In the two days since the nationalization of GM was announced, the callers and e-mailers to my program have been 10 to 1 against the Obamaization of the American car business. The reasons are many and varied. Some simply hate the naked exercise of federal power. Others see the first undeniable instance of socialism understood as the government's ownership of the means of production. Still others cannot believe that the shareholders and bondholders of a once great company have been stripped of their equity while the unions that helped bring the company down, escape nearly unscathed.

Almost everyone grasps immediately the deep unfairness to Ford and even the offshore carmakers that now compete against the massive subsidies of the federal government. How exactly is Ford supposed to bear its 'legacy costs' while GM is relieved of its past mistakes? How will the UAW negotiate fairly with Ford while realizing that every dollar bled from it is a dollar more likely to go to GM, in which the union now holds a huge equity position? How can every federal official interacting with any car company not know and act with the knowledge that the 'home team' - the president's team - is GM.

Corrupt cronyism has never had quite so large as stage as the new American car business, and the ramifications flowing out from Monday's announcement are just beginning to be glimpsed. On the same day the president announced the seizure and blithely declared that he had no interest in running the company, he called Detroit Mayor David Bing to assure him that GM would be staying put in its downtown Motor City headquarters. When the president himself is decreeing the leasing arrangements for the company, it is well and truly nationalized, no matter what he says for the benefit of the still-seduced MSM.

This is a decision that must be reversed. GM must be denationalized, the federal government divested of not just its controlling interest but all of its interest in the company. The Republican leadership must immediately and loudly demand the sale of the federal share in the company, even if it costs a large part of the $50 billion already invested. If the Administration balks - and it will, for why would Rahm Emmanuel willingly give up such an enormous political cudgel as a great car manufacturing company with its myriad and powerful though indirect tools of reward and punishment? - then every GOP candidate in 2010 must begin almost every speech with a reminder that the Democrats have willingly crossed a line that has never been crossed in American history. This is not a loan, not a subsidy, not even a massive assist, they must argue, but a seizure. This is not a continuation of George W. Bush's emergency aid, but a radical expansion of that crisis-driven intervention of late 2008 into a wholesale takeover five months later.

In the effort to reverse this lurch beyond the farthest left fringe of previous Democratic statist urges, individual Americans have a role to play. They have to say no to GM products and services until such time as the denationalization occurs. This is a painful conclusion for those of us with friends still working for the company, and who had supported aggressive efforts to help the private company restructure.

But there isn't any alternative, every dollar spent with GM is a dollar spent against free enterprise. Every car or truck purchased from Government Motors is one not purchased from a private car company that competes fairly against all other car companies. Many are rightly afraid that the government will do to automobile production what it has done for Amtrack and the Postal Service, but the risk is much greater than a federally mandated lemon.

The real risk is the enormous power of the federal government will so completely subsidize its own cars in so many ways that the private companies will be crippled or driven wholly from the field. What private company would want to compete against the unlimited resources of the feds?

President Obama has made an enormous, unprecedented grab for power, and fair-minded Democrats should join with Republicans to reverse it, and quickly.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Hugh Hewitt is host of a nationally syndicated radio talk show. Hugh Hewitt's new book is The War On The West.

Be the first to read Hugh Hewitt's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Pull your stupid heads out of your butt.
Both of them. The govt funding to GM is the purest form of capitalism that exists. What does an investor want to see in order to invest money in a business? Don't you have a clue? An investor wants to see a business plan that shows how the business will BECOME PROFITABLE. Otherwise, why bother to invest? Unless the objective is to lose money. Is that YOUR objective? GM was NOT PROFITABLE--and it was heading into bankruptcy ever since GWB destroyed the US economy and the job market. If you were familiar with Capitalism, you would know those facts. Simple question: Why do YOU put your money into stocks? How much are you planning to LOSE as an INVESTOR due to your investments? Or do you expect to make a profit? How, and why, are your investments any different than those made by the govt into GM and Chrysler? The biggest claims owed by GM and Chrysler were to their employees--under contracts signed by management over the years. Or don't you like to abide by a contract? Management knew of their obligations under those contracts--so where is the money? Ask management--because they never gave the money owed to the workers. Otherwise, your taxes will go up--VERY dramatically--to pay for all the new people on welfare due to the companies closure. Plus the closure of their suppliers, etc, etc. Can you say "Great Depression II"?

You're too late to take credit here
Funny. I didn't know you wrote comedy.

Hugh, um, GM is bankrupt. Their liabilities far exceed their assets. That's because we Americans stopped buying GM's products because GM no longer made what we wanted to buy. Other car companies made what we wanted to buy. So we bought their cars. That is until 2008 when no one bought anyone's cars. But the difference is...when given the choice and when given the means to buy, we Americans bought anything but GM...

Your grandstanding post, let's assume it's a sincere post. But grandstanding now, chest-thumping, etc on the grave of GM to promote your ideology...is kinda sad, really. At the best, it's spineless.

I'm willing to bet if GM doesn't emerge from bankruptcy you'll be the first to take credit for that...'success'.

Like Mike asked Why do you hate America? Why do you hate the workers who labored so many years to make GM a flagship of our manufacturing prowess only to see their efforts undone by management's refusal to design a car for us and our goals, not them and their goals.

Frankly, you owe your readers and the workers at GM an apology. It's not because you wrote an opinion with which we disagree. You owe the apology because as a leader you owe us all something better than this chest-thumping bit of ideological rebel-yell.

Best.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.