Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Cliff May :: Townhall.com Columnist
Future Shockwave?
by Cliff May
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


If you don’t live in Washington, New York, or another big city, you may think: “Even if the terrorists do strike again on American soil, my hometown and my family probably aren’t in danger.” Think again.

In 2001 the U.S. government established a commission to “assess the threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) attack.” The commission recently reported to Congress that if a nuclear warhead were to be detonated at high altitude over the American mainland the blast would produce an EMP — a shockwave so powerful that it would “cripple military and civilian communications, power, transportation, water, food, and other infrastructure.”

Lights would go out. Telecommunications would fail. Computers would crash. Bank accounts would disappear. The stock market would cease operation. Refrigerated food warehouse would shut down. Sanitation and emergency services would be crippled.

Before long, millions of Americans would, as the Wall Street Journal flatly phrased it, “die of starvation or want of medical care.” It would require months or even years for America to climb out of the pre-industrial hole into which it had been flung.

Any number of terrorists groups would be proud to carry out such an attack. But, as the EMP commission also reported, only Iran (1) is attempting to develop nuclear weapons; (2) has recently conducted multiple missile tests of its nuclear-capable Shahab-3 missiles; (3) has done so from cargo ships in the Caspian Sea; and (4) also has detonated those missiles at high altitude. What’s more, the CIA has translated Iranian military journals in which EMP attacks against the U.S. are explicitly discussed.

Ilan Berman, vice president of the American Foreign Policy Council and a member of the Committee on the Present Danger, comments: “Iran's interest in developing EMP capabilities suggests that in the near future, Iran could be able to carry out an asymmetric attack involving a mid-air nuclear detonation.”

Capability is one thing. Intention is another. Or is it? Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said: “The time for the fall of the satanic power of the United States has come and the countdown to the annihilation of the emperor of power and wealth has started.” He has added: “A world without the United States . . . can be achieved.”

An EMP attack would achieve that goal most rapidly because it would require only one nuclear weapon, and by using a ship as the launch pad, it would obviate the need for very long-range missiles (which Iran has not yet acquired).

You may be thinking: “Ahmadinejad and his mullah masters wouldn’t dare! They must know the destruction we’d rain on them in response.” First, those who believe — as, for example, Islamist suicide-bombers do — that death in a war against infidels leads to martyrdom and heavenly rewards cannot be deterred. For them, as Middle East scholar Bernard Lewis has observed, “mutually assured destruction in not a deterrent — it is an inducement.” Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Clifford D. May is the President of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.

Be the first to read Cliff May's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

HansFury is mostly right
But I would reconsider the 1% figure. When have we seen Muslims in any country - east or west, protest against this tiny 1% "radical" group? When has any portion of the other 99% ever spoken out against, or acted against, their easily controllable 1%?

I don't recall any Muslims anywhere in the world ever feeling ashamed that tens of thousands of so-called "moderate" Muslims danced in the streets and on their rooftops, or fired weapons of joy into the air, after attacks on the West. When has any Muslim on the planet ever shown anything but pride at the martydom of their tiny 1%, or did anything but defend their excuses?

If any of those imaginary "moderate" Muslims, (which we would like to think make up 99% of the total,) did more than express silent satisfaction or winks and nods, then we'd have more reason for hope. It would be simple for tight, family and community-oriented Muslims, to control their 1% "radicals" if they had the desire.

Even in America or England, where they can express themselves like nowhere else, have I ever heard of any active protests against this tiny 1%. The closest we've seen, after some undeniable atrocity somewhere, is a "moderate" coming on the airwaves with the typical "Yes, but..." verbal spanking and smoothing over of the atrocity.

In reality, it seems the distinction we've created between "radical" and "moderate" Muslim is a gift by the West. A gift that is neither blessed nor appreciated.

Time is on whose side
This is not a 10yr war, or a 100 yr war; the Muslims see this as the 1000yr war they have no interest in accelerating the time line. Every attack through the 90’s was designed to pick away at us, test our resolve, and of course under Clinton we failed in the resolve category. He weakened our military throughout his 8yr, all one has to do is look at the units who fought the first 3 months after 911 all Special Op the one part of the military were he couldn’t cut money. The 911 attacks did what they wanted, pulled us back into the Middle East; this of course has become a great recruiting tool for them. Not as good as it could have been, but only because we’ve shown great restraint. The reason we have not been attacked again, beyond the fact we’ve finely been more vigilant is attacking America brings Americans together, party lines disappear and we become one country again. Why would they want that when they can just sit back and watch the left weaken our military again and start all over again.

If low estimates are correct and only 1% of the Muslim world population is radical that is an Army of 10 million spread throughout the world, our forces across the board are around 1.5 million. Yes we have better intelligence (sometimes) we have better soldiers all the time, but at the end of the day we are fighting ourselves, the terrorist/Muslims are already here, and currently sheltered by our humanitarianism and our sense of justice they are manipulating our laws. They are not integrating into our world they are bring their world here; one look at Great Britton shows us the model.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.