A Few Simple Snarky Rules to Make Life Better
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Tipsheet

Sessions Sets the Tone for Fireworks

Guest blog post by Brian Darling on the Sotomayor hearings

Senator Jeff Sessions is opening the Republican side of the Senate Judiciary Committee battle on the Sotomayor nomination with some strong fighting words.  This is Sessions first high profile hearing as Ranking Member and Sessions has delivered a strong statement explaining the differences between a conservative and liberal view of the proper role of a federal judge.  Sessions says that the “empathy standard is another step down the road” to judicial activism.  Sessions worries that liberal activist judicial philosophy will lead to an America where “constitutional limits are ignored” and talked of a “fork in the road” of judicial philosophy.  Sessions worries that Sotomayor may take the wrong judicial road and push a more political role for judges. 

Advertisement

In a statement building on the argument that a judge needs to be neutral and not swayed by personal biases or experiences, Sessions pledged that “I will not vote for, and no Senator should vote for, any nominee who” is not fair.  Senator Sessions repeated that if a nominee exhibits a judicial philosophy that favors one side, that will be a “disqualifying” factor in this nomination.  Sessions line in the sand is strong.  A nominee may be qualified through experience and education, but may disqualify themselves if they are “not neutral” and “favor one team over another.”  Sessions blasted the empathy standard and stated that “sympathy is not law, it is more akin to politics.”  Sotomayor clearly will have to explain the now famous “wise Latina” comment and try to convince skeptical Republicans that she does not employ a selective empathy standard.

The opening statements of Chairman Leahy and Ranking Member Sessions have set the table for the tone of the debate over the next few days.  Sessions has marked a line in the sand and his tone was much more direct than Leahy.  Expect some fireworks over the next few days in this hearing.  Republicans asking tough questions about Sotomayor’s judicial philosophy and the Democrats playing defense and stressing her compelling personal story. 

Brian Darling is the Director of Senate Relations for the Heritage Foundation.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement