Black People Are Not Children, Nor Are They Special
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 322: What the Bible Says About Gifts
A Pile of Dog Poop Doesn’t Stink As Bad As a Mountain of...
When All They Have Are Lies
When a Hug Becomes a Crime: A Warning From West Virginia
Being Investigated for Good Reason: Trump Accuser E. Jean Carroll
They Broke the Law, Censored the Truth, and Pardoned Themselves. We Must Never...
Germany's Economic Stagnation Has a Root Cause — and It's in the Classroom
Manosphere: Masculinity Without Virtue and Sacrifice
Israeli Firm Picked for Texas Desalination Plant
Violent Rioters Attack Journalist Covering Antifa Activity Outside of ICE Detention Center
Maryland Man Pleads Guilty to Stealing $270K in Social Security Disability Benefits While...
Platner Maintained Sexually-Suggestive Profile on 'Predator's Paradise' App Known For Chil...
Illegal Alien Sentenced to Nearly 3 Years for 20-Year Identity Theft, Benefits and...
White House Calls NYT Report on Vance Social Media Advice 'Complete Fake News'
Tipsheet

San Francisco Introduces Legislation Banning 'Juuls'

San Francisco Introduces Legislation Banning 'Juuls'

The San Francisco Chronicle reports that city officials introduced legislation today which would ban citizens from using popular electronic cigarettes as well as prohibit companies such as Juul from occupying city-owned property in the future. In short, officials message for  would be vapers -- is  "we don't [you] in our city." 

Advertisement

The two bills introduced by City Attorney Dennis Herrera and Supervisor Shamann Walton are supposedly aimed towards cracking down on youth vaping, which critics say lead to early cases of nicotine addiction. 

“I don’t eventually want to see them leave this city," Walton said of the company Juul, which currently owns property in San Francisco. “I would have liked for them to have been gone yesterday.”

One bill introduced by the San Francisco officials would ban the shipment to and the selling from all city convenience stores, gas stations, and other shops "until the U.S. Food and Drug Administration begins a vetting process known as a pre-market review, in which manufacturers must prove their products are appropriate for public health before selling them on the market."

The second bill would ban companies from using city-owned property. However, this bill would not be applied retroactively.

City officials held a press conference today, criticizing companies that sell e-cigarettes for their predatory practices. 

Advertisement

Related:

VAPING

"These companies may hide behind the veneer of harm reduction, but let’s be clear, their product is addiction,” Herrera said. “They’re in the business of getting people addicted, or keeping them addicted.”

Juul responded to the proposed legislation by saying, “We encourage the City of San Francisco to severely restrict youth access but do so in a way that preserves the opportunity to eliminate combustible cigarettes...This proposed legislation begs the question, why would the city be comfortable with combustible cigarettes being on shelves when we know they kill more than 480,000 Americans per year?"

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement