New Memo: Internal Polling Shows a Post Debate Bump
BREAKING: Trump Has Made a Decision on Another Debate
Seattle Times Tried to Fact-Check Trump. They Got Nuked on Social Media Instead.
CBS News Segment Alludes to Historic Support for Donald Trump
House Oversight Committee Announces Hearing Over 'Incompetence' of Biden-Harris Admin
Trump Announces a New Tax-Cut Proposal
Trump Campaign Responds to Garland's Claims on the DOJ Being Used As 'Political...
Former Dem Accuses Kamala Harris of Taking 'Acting Lessons' From Hollywood Elites
Kamala Harris Has a New Campaign Strategy Post-Debate
More Charges Dismissed in Trump's Georgia Case
Will Kamala Harris Get a Bump in the Polls After the Debate?
The Left Attacked This Liberal Actress for Showing Support for Trump After His...
Here's What Mitt Romney Said About the Trump vs. Harris Debate
Michigan and Nevada Face Election Integrity Lawsuits From RNC
NYC Police Commissioner Resigns
Tipsheet

New York Judge Deals Another Blow to Trump

AP Photo/Seth Wenig

New York Judge Juan Merchan — set to oversee former President Donald Trump's hush money trial in New York — announced Monday that he would not recuse himself from the matter brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg dealing with alleged payments made improperly to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election.

Advertisement

In a court filing dated August 11 and released on Monday, Judge Merchan acknowledged the precedent that a trial judge "must carefully weigh the policy of promoting public confidence in the judiciary against the possibility that those questioning his impartiality might be seeking to avoid the adverse consequences of his presiding over their case." 

After making such considerations in Trump's case, Merchan concluded that "recusal would not be in the public interest" after examining his "conscience" and deciding he's "certain" in his "ability to be fair and impartial." 

As such, Trump's motion for Merchan to recuse himself was "denied on all grounds" and Trump's legal team will have to make its case at a trial overseen by Merchan.

The Trump Team's motion came as a result of revelations in Townhall that Merchan had made financial contributions to Democrat political causes, but the judge insisted in the filing that such facts did not warrant his recusal from Trump's case.

Advertisement

Saying that "the reported political contributions are a de minimus donation, not warranting recusal," Merchan stated that such contributions "do not raise a plausible concern regarding the appearance of impartiality" since identifying with a political party "is not an indication that a judge is incapable of acting impartially."

That is, the judge was asked to recuse himself, he checked his own biases, and decided there were none to report. 

As Townhall reported earlier this summer, Trump is charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in an untested legal strategy that the former president's team says smacks of the same dubious grounds as the Russia collusion hoax. Trump entered a plea of "not guilty" on all counts and has maintained his innocence. 

This is a developing story and may be updated. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement