This GOP Candidate Is Taking On Tarrant County’s Power Brokers
Chris Cuomo Provides a History of His Failed Journalism, Vogue Swoons As It...
American Society of Plastic Surgeons Opposes 'Gender Affirming' Surgeries for Children
Roger Goodell Punts on Political Halftime Show
Report: TMZ Allegedly Received a Ransom Note for Missing Nancy Guthrie
How You Know Chicago Isn't That Worried About 'Gun Violence'
Gushing Over Gavin
Fellow Democratic Socialist Slams Mayor Mamdani as Storm Blackouts Leave Thousands Without...
Greg Gutfeld Blasts Hollywood and Billie Eilish for Their Hypocrisy and Disconnect From...
Colorado Public School Gives Class to Children on How to Follow and Doxx...
Man Charged for Attacking Federal Officers With a Knife
The Judicial Coup Continues: Judge Blocks ICE From Using Tear Gas on Leftist...
Baltimore Mayor Calls Reporter Racist For Asking Why He Needs $163k Taxpayer-Funded SUV
Major Builders Announce 'Trump Homes' to Solve Affordability Crisis for First-Time Buyers
DOJ Launches Investigation Into California Catholic School Desecrated and Destroyed by Van...
Tipsheet

New York Judge Deals Another Blow to Trump

AP Photo/Seth Wenig

New York Judge Juan Merchan — set to oversee former President Donald Trump's hush money trial in New York — announced Monday that he would not recuse himself from the matter brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg dealing with alleged payments made improperly to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election.

Advertisement

In a court filing dated August 11 and released on Monday, Judge Merchan acknowledged the precedent that a trial judge "must carefully weigh the policy of promoting public confidence in the judiciary against the possibility that those questioning his impartiality might be seeking to avoid the adverse consequences of his presiding over their case." 

After making such considerations in Trump's case, Merchan concluded that "recusal would not be in the public interest" after examining his "conscience" and deciding he's "certain" in his "ability to be fair and impartial." 

As such, Trump's motion for Merchan to recuse himself was "denied on all grounds" and Trump's legal team will have to make its case at a trial overseen by Merchan.

The Trump Team's motion came as a result of revelations in Townhall that Merchan had made financial contributions to Democrat political causes, but the judge insisted in the filing that such facts did not warrant his recusal from Trump's case.

Advertisement

Related:

DONALD TRUMP

Saying that "the reported political contributions are a de minimus donation, not warranting recusal," Merchan stated that such contributions "do not raise a plausible concern regarding the appearance of impartiality" since identifying with a political party "is not an indication that a judge is incapable of acting impartially."

That is, the judge was asked to recuse himself, he checked his own biases, and decided there were none to report. 

As Townhall reported earlier this summer, Trump is charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in an untested legal strategy that the former president's team says smacks of the same dubious grounds as the Russia collusion hoax. Trump entered a plea of "not guilty" on all counts and has maintained his innocence. 

This is a developing story and may be updated. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos