Trump Brutally Owns Nicolás Maduro and the Libs
Goodbye and Good Riddance to Marjorie Taylor Greene
Truth in Lies
A Call for Principled MAGA Unity
What Do Democrats Prioritize?
Trump Should Confront the Mexican Drug Problem Next
The Seven Facets of Healing with Rabbi Leo Dee
Inflation: The Role of a Mistaken Supreme Court
The World is Cheering the Removal of Maduro, So Why are US Leftists...
The Netflix-Warner Brothers Deal Puts America First
What is a 'Mental Disorder' or 'Illness?'
The Netflix-Warner Bros. Deal Puts America First
Rubio Claims Oil Quarantine Will Force Change After Maduro Capture
Chicago Teachers Union Focuses on Venezuela as Test Scores Drop
Kamala Harris Slams Maduro Capture Despite Biden-Harris $25M Bounty
Tipsheet

'Crisis': Bud Light's Trans Stunt Gets Anheuser-Busch Stock Downgraded

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File

Financial services company HSBC formally downgraded Anheuser-Busch InBev stock to "hold" this week as a result of the ongoing blowback to the Bud Light brand's embrace of transgender activist Dylan Mulvaney that caused sales of the product to plummet — potentially upwards of 25 percent — in April. 

Advertisement

First reported by CNBC, HSBC's Carlos Laboy — a managing director in the company's global beverage sector — didn't mince words about what's happened to Anheuser-Busch InBev (ABI) amid its "Bud Light crisis" as a result of its evidently shortsighted plunge into a culture war battle that alienated and angered customers, causing "deeper problems than ABI admits."

Saying that ABI's attempts to get the "brand culture transformation right" are "mixed," Laboy explained that the "way this Bud Light crisis came about a month ago, management's response to it and the loss of unprecedented volume and brand relevance raises many questions."

Among those questions is a basic one: What were Bud Light and ABI thinking?

Laboy put it succinctly in his note following HSBC's decision to downgrade Anheuser-Busch stock: "Why did its U.S. leadership underestimate the risk of pushback given the recent experience of other firms? Is A-B hiring the best people to grow the brands and gauge risk?” he asked, although the answer seems to be a resounding "no." As Townhall reported, multiple executives were placed on leave as a result of the Mulvaney stunt. 

Advertisement

Related:

WOKE

"If Budweiser and Bud Light are iconic American ideas that have long brought consumers together, why did these marketers fail to invite new consumers without alienating the core base of the firm’s largest brand?" Laboy also asked. 

That's a question for Bud Light's senior marketing executive (now on leave) Alissa Heinerscheid who called Bud Light "out of touch" and "fratty" on a podcast before teaming up with Mulvaney in a bizarre attempt to remake Bud Light's image that succeeded only in driving away much of its existing customer base. 

In the aftermath of its botched attempt at rebranding, Bud Light has tried pretty much anything — including giving away free beer — to win its customers back. So far, it doesn't seem to be working too well. 

To be clear, this whole mess was because Bud Light decided it would be a good idea to celebrate Mulvaney — a biological male who identifies as a woman — and mark 365 days of him "being a girl" with a special can of its suds. Bud light initially stood by its decision as the internet began to turn on the company, then scrambled to distance itself claiming there was "no formal campaign" featuring Mulvaney. 

Advertisement

Whether that's technically true or just more desperate damage control, Bud Light's customers saw all they needed to in order to decide the product was no longer for them. With HSBC's formal downgrade of its parent company's stock, it seems we're still discovering just how much damage Bud Light did to itself.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement