This Bill Maher Episode Was Wild...and the Libs Are Not Going to Like...
Caitlin Clark Is Making Other WNBA Coaches Post Delusional Nonsense on Social Media
It Was Clear Kathy Hochul Was Not Welcome Here
We Shouldn't Be Shocked If the Venezuela Earthquakes Wiped Out Tens of Thousands...
Why Janice Dean Got Forced Into Retirement
Gavin Newsom Just Took This Stupid Billionaire Tax Idea to a Whole New...
One Dead After Eight People Overdose While DC Struggles to Combat Opioid Addiction
The U.S.'s Path to the World Cup Final Is Here and It's Not...
San Francisco Trans March Turns on One of California's Most Radical Progressive Democrat
Alaska Judge Rules That Bogus Democrat-Recruited Senate Candidate Can Remain on Ballot
Texas Democrats Have a Plan to Beat Ken Paxton: Calling Talarico's Supporters Gay...
Cities Won’t Solve the Housing Crisis by Blaming Software
Trump’s Anthropic Action Proves International AI Moratorium Is Possible
Punish Success and Capital Will Leave
Does the Rest of the World Care More About America Than… Americans?
Tipsheet

RESULTS: Wisconsin's Supreme Court Election

RESULTS: Wisconsin's Supreme Court Election
AP Photo/Morry Gash

Voters in the Badger State turned out on Tuesday to vote in a consequential spring election to choose a Supreme Court justice to serve a ten-year term that could shift the ideological balance of Wisconsin's Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Even though Wisconsin's Supreme Court election is nonpartisan, Guy had a great explainer on the stakes in Tuesday's election — one that has become the most expensive state Supreme Court race in U.S. history. 

Democrats are backing lower court Judge Janet Protasiewicz. If she wins, Wisconsin's highest court would shift to have a liberal majority for the first time in quite a while. 

Across the aisle, Republicans are backing former state Supreme Court Justice Daniel Kelly, hoping to preserve the court's longstanding conservative majority.

Polls in Wisconsin closed at 8:00 p.m. CT, and live results in the race will update below:

In addition to the Supreme Court race, voters registered their opinion on two state referenda questions dealing with criminal justice policies. 

Advertisement

Related:

2024 ELECTION

Question 1 asked voters: "Shall section 8 (2) of article I of the constitution be amended to allow a court to impose on an accused person being released before conviction conditions that are designed to protect the community from serious harm?" 

Question 2 asked: "Shall section 8 (2) of article I of the constitution be amended to allow a court to impose cash bail on a person accused of a violent crime based on the totality of the circumstances, including the accused's previous convictions for a violent crime, the probability that the accused will fail to appear, the need to protect the community from serious harm and prevent witness intimidation, and potential affinitive defenses?"

Advertisement

A third question to voters — an advisory referendum that would not change Wisconsin's state code — asked residents to answer whether "able-bodied, childless adults be required to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits?"

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement