Texas GOP Had an Elephant Stroll Through Their Convention. It Took a Massive...
Judge Smacks Down Lefty Boomer's Lawsuit Over Trump's UFC Fight and Cites a...
We Had Update in the Nancy Guthrie Case...Don't Get Too Excited
Nancy Mace Isn't Handling Her Crushing Defeat in the SC Primary Well
The ACLJ and Nearly 30 Organizations Are Defending a Pregnancy Resource Center Against...
California Dems Say You Can't Watch the World Cup If You Hate DEI
It Isn't Over. Spencer Pratt Just Declared War.
Elon Musk Just Became the World's First Trillionaire and the Socialists Are Already...
Vice President JD Vance Blasts 'Leaked' Iran Deal, Says Final Agreement Will Lead...
The Heart of Jesus Compels Our Love for Every Life
Texas Couple Gets 40 Years for $30M Pyramid Scheme That Preyed on 10,000...
13 Charged in NY-Based Stolen Car Ring That Moved Over 100 Vehicles Worth...
Jamaican National Charged With Using Fake Marriage, Army Service to Fraudulently Obtain US...
John Cornyn Renews His Attention-Seeking Temper Tantrum
EXCLUSIVE: Illegal Alien Charged With Child Sexual Abuse Faces ICE Detainer
Tipsheet

RESULTS: Wisconsin's Supreme Court Election

RESULTS: Wisconsin's Supreme Court Election
AP Photo/Morry Gash

Voters in the Badger State turned out on Tuesday to vote in a consequential spring election to choose a Supreme Court justice to serve a ten-year term that could shift the ideological balance of Wisconsin's Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Even though Wisconsin's Supreme Court election is nonpartisan, Guy had a great explainer on the stakes in Tuesday's election — one that has become the most expensive state Supreme Court race in U.S. history. 

Democrats are backing lower court Judge Janet Protasiewicz. If she wins, Wisconsin's highest court would shift to have a liberal majority for the first time in quite a while. 

Across the aisle, Republicans are backing former state Supreme Court Justice Daniel Kelly, hoping to preserve the court's longstanding conservative majority.

Polls in Wisconsin closed at 8:00 p.m. CT, and live results in the race will update below:

In addition to the Supreme Court race, voters registered their opinion on two state referenda questions dealing with criminal justice policies. 

Advertisement

Related:

2024 ELECTION

Question 1 asked voters: "Shall section 8 (2) of article I of the constitution be amended to allow a court to impose on an accused person being released before conviction conditions that are designed to protect the community from serious harm?" 

Question 2 asked: "Shall section 8 (2) of article I of the constitution be amended to allow a court to impose cash bail on a person accused of a violent crime based on the totality of the circumstances, including the accused's previous convictions for a violent crime, the probability that the accused will fail to appear, the need to protect the community from serious harm and prevent witness intimidation, and potential affinitive defenses?"

Advertisement

A third question to voters — an advisory referendum that would not change Wisconsin's state code — asked residents to answer whether "able-bodied, childless adults be required to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits?"

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement